Community

 
Magic: The Gathering Standard General Will Delver of Secrets see a ban? A Discussion.
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 5 of 16  •  Prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Will Delver of Secrets see a ban? A Discussion.
1 year ago  ::  Apr 03, 2012 - 6:59PM #41
javert
Date Joined: Jul 26, 2006
Posts: 1,313

Apr 2, 2012 -- 9:33PM, MrIndigo wrote:

..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" contenteditable="true" />Hitting for 3 on Turn 2 wasn't the problem in Modern. That's not why Wild Nacatl was banned - after all, Steppe Lynx hits for 4 on Turn 2, possibly more if you have Hierarchs.



True, the real reason was that Nacatl made every other aggro option look worse but isn't it already the case with U / W Delver too? Other aggro decks have a coinflip matchup at best against it, and Delver is miles better against control.


The removal that's good against Delver but bad against Stalker and Geist is actually a problem wiuth Stalker and Geist (and the mechanic hexproof in general), not Delver.



Hexproof as a mechanic is okay as long as the creatures are fair in combat. Neither Troll Ascetic, Trun have ever been broken or even dominant in any format. Geist is the main offender here, since hexproof besides being three mana - bashes for six with pseudoevasion is over the top. (Stalker is quite noninteractive  but I don't think it is too much of a problem alone.

Delver doesn't have any amazing foils, but it doesn't have any amazingly strong matchups either. That's why it works. It's win% against any given archetype is usually slightly above or below 50%, meaning at playskill and experience tend to be a more decisive factor.



It may not have 70 % over anything but being 55 % is enough to make it ban worthy. So far only Frites and Grixis control seem to have a good matchup against it, and both are more close to anti-Delver decks that lose against anything else than legitimate decks.

If Limited gets in the way of printing good Constructed cards...

Screw limited
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 04, 2012 - 2:59AM #42
MrIndigo
  • Mr. Indigo
Date Joined: Mar 27, 2003
Posts: 13,416

Apr 3, 2012 -- 6:59PM, javert wrote:

Apr 2, 2012 -- 9:33PM, MrIndigo wrote:

..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" contenteditable="true" />Hitting for 3 on Turn 2 wasn't the problem in Modern. That's not why Wild Nacatl was banned - after all, Steppe Lynx hits for 4 on Turn 2, possibly more if you have Hierarchs.



True, the real reason was that Nacatl made every other aggro option look worse but isn't it already the case with U / W Delver too? Other aggro decks have a coinflip matchup at best against it, and Delver is miles better against control.




There are reasons not to run Delver - the fact that you need to fill your deck with instants and sorceries instead of threats, for instance. That's a sizable opportunity cost. Running fetchlands for duals is what you're doing anyway, so there was never a reason NOT to play Nacatl.


The removal that's good against Delver but bad against Stalker and Geist is actually a problem wiuth Stalker and Geist (and the mechanic hexproof in general), not Delver.



Hexproof as a mechanic is okay as long as the creatures are fair in combat. Neither Troll Ascetic, Trun have ever been broken or even dominant in any format. Geist is the main offender here, since hexproof besides being three mana - bashes for six with pseudoevasion is over the top. (Stalker is quite noninteractive  but I don't think it is too much of a problem alone.




Troll Ascetic was absolutely dominant in its time, for exactly the same reason that Geist and Stalker are now - you can stick ridiculous equipment on them at no penalty.

Thrun is less so, because it costs more, but it still single-handedly wins every Contro matchup it sees play in.

Delver doesn't have any amazing foils, but it doesn't have any amazingly strong matchups either. That's why it works. It's win% against any given archetype is usually slightly above or below 50%, meaning at playskill and experience tend to be a more decisive factor.



It may not have 70 % over anything but being 55 % is enough to make it ban worthy. So far only Frites and Grixis control seem to have a good matchup against it, and both are more close to anti-Delver decks that lose against anything else than legitimate decks.




I disagree on this point. Having a variable win% against the format between 45%-55% is nothing like deserving of a ban; the only people who are going to ride that to a consistent victory are the best players who can shift those % points upwards. I think that makes for a more skill intensive and lower variance game, which is fine at the competitive level.

Nov 4, 2010 -- 9:11AM, Niche wrote:

Nov 3, 2010 -- 10:05PM, Razorgore wrote:

It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.



It should be about giving black cards to Niche.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 07, 2012 - 7:49AM #43
catowner
Date Joined: Jun 8, 2010
Posts: 6,967
Overall, I don't think delver decks are really "delver" decks so much as they are "tempo aggro with cantrips and equips".  Delver facilitates that strategy by using the high instant/sorcery count to get a very efficient beater, but if the deck were just about delver, it wouldn't get very far .
1000th post November 26, 2010.
Where Islands gets his decks:
Spoiler: Show

Apr 23, 2012 -- 12:20AM, Islands wrote:

It was revealed to me in a dream.  All the cards were in my dream except for three slots which I plugged in as Vault Skirge.

FULL DISCLOSURE:  The dream was post AVR so there was a copy of Slayer's Stronghold.  I decided to keep it pre AVR in my post here.

EDIT: I just remembered.  The Skirges might have been 2x Whipflare and 1x something else, probably War and Peace.

EDIT2:  Currently 4-0 in my first four games with this.  My opponents have been very angry.  I fought off a Wurmcoil from Grixis for six turns before I found my second Dispatch.  Jeez, I can do a lot of damage.

EDIT3: Streak broken.  Lost to an unexpected Overrun.    Cracking a Shrine for 10 wasn't enough.   



How Kedi tests his decks:
Spoiler: Show

also, I've been playtesting this deck in my sleep today
that kinda freaked me out

Sleeping on Halloween:
Spoiler: Show

Halloween is a conspiracy by crossdressers and furries.

Photobucket
Thanks to Kipz for the sig.
Make a contract with me to become a magical girl!
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 07, 2012 - 8:57AM #44
ajb1238
Date Joined: Oct 17, 2010
Posts: 465
The problem with jamming in Gut Shot , Shock , Tragic Slip etc... against U/W delver is that those spells are really only relevant against delver (the creature).  This results in a massive virtual card advantage for the delver player when they're holding Geist of Saint Traft , Lingering Souls , or Invisible Stalker  and you're gripping a gut shot or two.  I agree with catowner, these  U/W and Esper tempo decks are strong on their own, Delver of Secrets just puts them over the top.  I'm still not sure it's time to ban...yet.

I wish Smallpox wasn't so terrible against basically every other deck in the format right now.  With 21 lands and a relatively low creature count that card could be such an insane blowout against Delver.  Edict effects in general are high impact against U/W Delver, Esper not so much.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 07, 2012 - 1:47PM #45
catowner
Date Joined: Jun 8, 2010
Posts: 6,967
the "21 lands" is misleading.  They run so many cantrips that their real land count is effectively much higher.
1000th post November 26, 2010.
Where Islands gets his decks:
Spoiler: Show

Apr 23, 2012 -- 12:20AM, Islands wrote:

It was revealed to me in a dream.  All the cards were in my dream except for three slots which I plugged in as Vault Skirge.

FULL DISCLOSURE:  The dream was post AVR so there was a copy of Slayer's Stronghold.  I decided to keep it pre AVR in my post here.

EDIT: I just remembered.  The Skirges might have been 2x Whipflare and 1x something else, probably War and Peace.

EDIT2:  Currently 4-0 in my first four games with this.  My opponents have been very angry.  I fought off a Wurmcoil from Grixis for six turns before I found my second Dispatch.  Jeez, I can do a lot of damage.

EDIT3: Streak broken.  Lost to an unexpected Overrun.    Cracking a Shrine for 10 wasn't enough.   



How Kedi tests his decks:
Spoiler: Show

also, I've been playtesting this deck in my sleep today
that kinda freaked me out

Sleeping on Halloween:
Spoiler: Show

Halloween is a conspiracy by crossdressers and furries.

Photobucket
Thanks to Kipz for the sig.
Make a contract with me to become a magical girl!
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 07, 2012 - 9:41PM #46
Jman22
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Posts: 2,794

Apr 7, 2012 -- 1:47PM, catowner wrote:

the "21 lands" is misleading.  They run so many cantrips that their real land count is effectively much higher.




Smallpox is still rather good against Delver though. Assuming they don't counter it.

(at)MrEnglish22
"still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris"
-On the topic of Squire
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 07, 2012 - 10:28PM #47
catowner
Date Joined: Jun 8, 2010
Posts: 6,967
Unless I am running stuff the synergizes with it, I'd really rather just run geth's verdict. 
1000th post November 26, 2010.
Where Islands gets his decks:
Spoiler: Show

Apr 23, 2012 -- 12:20AM, Islands wrote:

It was revealed to me in a dream.  All the cards were in my dream except for three slots which I plugged in as Vault Skirge.

FULL DISCLOSURE:  The dream was post AVR so there was a copy of Slayer's Stronghold.  I decided to keep it pre AVR in my post here.

EDIT: I just remembered.  The Skirges might have been 2x Whipflare and 1x something else, probably War and Peace.

EDIT2:  Currently 4-0 in my first four games with this.  My opponents have been very angry.  I fought off a Wurmcoil from Grixis for six turns before I found my second Dispatch.  Jeez, I can do a lot of damage.

EDIT3: Streak broken.  Lost to an unexpected Overrun.    Cracking a Shrine for 10 wasn't enough.   



How Kedi tests his decks:
Spoiler: Show

also, I've been playtesting this deck in my sleep today
that kinda freaked me out

Sleeping on Halloween:
Spoiler: Show

Halloween is a conspiracy by crossdressers and furries.

Photobucket
Thanks to Kipz for the sig.
Make a contract with me to become a magical girl!
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 30, 2012 - 4:48AM #48
Jman22
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Posts: 2,794
So I want to dredge this back up with a little info-graph Chapin postind in his SCG article today:

 

The "this week" meta is based off SCG Nashville from this past weekend, and I'm hard pressed to find a reason not to believe that something will need to drastically change for Delver to not be the big bad deck of standard.

And to quote Chapin's closing statements:
"

Again, this isn't out of nowhere, and whenever the best deck is able to adopt a bunch of breakthrough new technology that greatly improves it in the exact perfect ways... Well, it is a dangerous thing. Just looking at the list, I can tell you it is not every day I see a Faeries deck that makes me want to completely abandon any thought of playing control. This is such a deck. This deck just looks absurd. Hopefully, the World Cup Qualifiers will divert this, but they might end up making it worse. You think the pros aren't going to all play Caw-Blade? If you have the answer, you better speak up fast.


What would be banned, if anything?


No, not Delver. That is not the real problem at all. This deck would still exist without Delver. Delver is relatively easily answerable.


What about Ponder? It was banned in other formats so it is not a stretch; however, you could replace it with more cantrips that are slightly weaker, and the deck wouldn't lose all that much.


The answer is crystal clear, and you already know what I am going to say.


"Snapcaster Mage is too good.""


Sure, he isn't saying Delver of Secrets is going to be banned (like I did, but mostly to get the ball rolling and the fact that I really, really like Snapkeep Mage) but it sure seems a lot like when Caw-Blade was standard - deck is one of the top decks, WotC prints a card that makes that deck better, and boom.
And yes, I'm only quoting the part of Chapin's article that supports my view, not the "this might not happen" or the "this might be one week of showings, but..." parts, but the beef of the article boils down to that last bit. 

EDIT: The other SCG Premium article today is on the same topic, but I've yet to read it. Also, removing the SCG link in the quote. 

EDIT2: Sam Black says pretty much the same thing as Chapin: Delver is by leagues the best deck in standard, and he suggests banning Delver of Secrets or Snapcaster Mage. 

(at)MrEnglish22
"still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris"
-On the topic of Squire
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 30, 2012 - 7:08AM #49
Xylovenious
Date Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Posts: 178

May 30, 2012 -- 4:48AM, Jman22 wrote:

So I want to dredge this back up with a little info-graph Chapin postind in his SCG article today:

 

The "this week" meta is based off SCG Nashville from this past weekend, and I'm hard pressed to find a reason not to believe that something will need to drastically change for Delver to not be the big bad deck of standard.

And to quote Chapin's closing statements:
"

Again, this isn't out of nowhere, and whenever the best deck is able to adopt a bunch of breakthrough new technology that greatly improves it in the exact perfect ways... Well, it is a dangerous thing. Just looking at the list, I can tell you it is not every day I see a Faeries deck that makes me want to completely abandon any thought of playing control. This is such a deck. This deck just looks absurd. Hopefully, the World Cup Qualifiers will divert this, but they might end up making it worse. You think the pros aren't going to all play Caw-Blade? If you have the answer, you better speak up fast.


What would be banned, if anything?


No, not Delver. That is not the real problem at all. This deck would still exist without Delver. Delver is relatively easily answerable.


What about Ponder? It was banned in other formats so it is not a stretch; however, you could replace it with more cantrips that are slightly weaker, and the deck wouldn't lose all that much.


The answer is crystal clear, and you already know what I am going to say.


"Snapcaster Mage is too good.""


Sure, he isn't saying Delver of Secrets is going to be banned (like I did, but mostly to get the ball rolling and the fact that I really, really like Snapkeep Mage) but it sure seems a lot like when Caw-Blade was standard - deck is one of the top decks, WotC prints a card that makes that deck better, and boom.
And yes, I'm only quoting the part of Chapin's article that supports my view, not the "this might not happen" or the "this might be one week of showings, but..." parts, but the beef of the article boils down to that last bit. 

EDIT: The other SCG Premium article today is on the same topic, but I've yet to read it. Also, removing the SCG link in the quote. 

EDIT2: Sam Black says pretty much the same thing as Chapin: Delver is by leagues the best deck in standard, and he suggests banning Delver of Secrets or Snapcaster Mage. 


The deck known as U/W Delver probably is the big, bad deck of Standard until rotation.   As has been pointed out, this would probably still be the case even if Delver itself were banned because the deck is really about synergies rather than one card.  The two cards that would really seem to cripple the deck if banned would be Geist and Snapcaster.  Geist is particularly aggregious due to costing.  It would still be a pretty good card at 5 cmc.

Hopefully, both Ponder and Mana Leak will not be included in M13.  Without those, Delver of Secrets isn't all that great since you can't reliably set it up and counter removal  in the first three turns.  This would also bring Snapcaster back to Earth a bit.  

In the meanwhile, Standard just isn't all that fun if you don't enjoy running Delver.   I've tried it, and found it to be incredibly boring though it did set up the most reliable win conditions.   It just seemed to be a mindlessly mechanical style of play.   

I wish Wizards would do something to address, but I'm not very hopeful. 
    

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  May 30, 2012 - 9:25AM #50
Burning_Forest
Date Joined: Aug 8, 2008
Posts: 11,394
for funsies, i've been trying blade splicer over geist... nope, the deck is still good.  so it probably isn't giest alone either.  i wanted to try blade splicer for the interaction with the angel.

i uh....i'm... i'm getting really sick of UW tempo based decks just dominating standard for the last... howeveer the hell long its been.  gimme back my slow blue based control.  blue should just not get aggressively costed creatures.  period.   and quite frankly, i'm not really even complaining that much, as i seem not to face delver as much as i would think and still do OK against it, but i can see where the meta game is headed.  its pretty obvious. 
Blue is the best color ever.  How do you deal?

Team GFG - "gulf, foxtrot, gulf"   Twitter: Burning_Forest

------------------------------------------------------

I started making some Dubstep and Electronica. 
Check me out here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXLxlHeE1rg

My Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/whitefender69?feature=mhee


It is a little bit chill. Let me know what you think.


Photobucket
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 5 of 16  •  Prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16 Next
Jump Menu:
 
Magic: The Gathering Standard General Will Delver of Secrets see a ban? A Discussion.
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing