Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Switch to Forum Live View 02/03/2012 LD: "A (Planes?)Walk Through the Multiverse"
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 11:02AM #21
fuxorfly
Date Joined: Nov 10, 2010
Posts: 165
Zac is hilarious. He is quickly become one of my favorite authors to read here, just because his tone, style, everything is just so perfect. Explaining who everyone is, then having a quick, self-deprecating "some idiot. poor guy" on his own explanation was tastefully done; sometimes, you have days where you feel like the stupidest person around. But hes quick to share what he thinks isn't a good thing ("i dont like durdly incremental value flashback"), even about the most recent set, which I feel a lot of people on the mothership aren't willing to do. Basically, his style just reads as very down-to-earth, and its always a pleasure to get to his articles.

A+, would read again.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 12:18PM #22
Spuuky
Date Joined: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 130
It's funny; I wish every game of Magic were about the slow accumulation of incremental advantages, and he wishes none of them were. Oh well, obviously someone there is on my side or Mulches and Desperate Ravings wouldn't be printed. 
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 1:45PM #23
WotC_MattT
  • Legit
Date Joined: Aug 9, 2007
Posts: 530
Meow.
Magic: The Gathering Rules Manager
Wizards of the Coast

Follow me @TabakRules
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 2:48PM #24
Qilong
Date Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Posts: 2,226

Feb 3, 2012 -- 1:45PM, WotC_MattT wrote:

Meow.



I have to say, Sanctuary Cat tickles my fancy, as a cat-lover. The same has been true of a few other vanilla commons that have been printed of late. The problem runs toward when you compare them to other commons like Ezuri's Archers : a super-cheap common with THREE abilities. "You guys" (R&D) think that's good, but not some ability to make a "french vanilla" common.

"Possibilities abound, too numerous to count."

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)

"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion Backs)
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 2:49PM #25
Astronautic_Bullfrog
Date Joined: May 17, 2009
Posts: 86
To be honest, the only reason I ever open packs is to draft, because drafting is just that much fun for me. I consider it money lost unless I win or happen to open something expensive, but I don't expect either to happen. If I want to play the financial game, I buy and sell singles that I expect to go up and down in price. IMO, it's never been very smart to rely on opening specific cards in draft to get your money's worth. Of course, I only play online, I have a heavy bias in favor of drafting for drafting's sake, and the only constructed format I play competitively is Pauper, so...yeah. I guess I'm probably the one here with the most "skewed" view of the set. Still, it ain't no Worldwake, but from what I can gather from card prices so far, it doesn't seem like the set has that bad of an EV.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 3:50PM #26
Qmark
  • vitriol and virtue
Date Joined: May 18, 2002
Posts: 16,530
You guys realize you're all gushing over two weaksauce Portal cards , right?
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 4:04PM #27
Qilong
Date Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Posts: 2,226

Feb 3, 2012 -- 3:50PM, Qmark wrote:

You guys realize you're all gushing over two weaksauce Portal cards , right?



Yes. But it's a cat. That makes all the more difference. Note that I like Kami of Old Stone a lot, too.

"Possibilities abound, too numerous to count."

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)

"Ever since man first left his cave and met a stranger with a different language and a new way of looking at things, the human race has had a dream: to kill him, so we don't have to learn his language or his new way of looking at things." --- Zapp Brannigan (Beast With a Billion Backs)
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 4:05PM #28
Leo-tech
Date Joined: Oct 23, 2011
Posts: 62
This comment has nothing to do with this article. Idea: no DCFs in avr right? Think that means no werewolves? Really, REALLY want a legendary werewolf for a tribal werewolf EDH deck? Wishing that R&D would come to their senses and NOT deprive EDHers of a werewolf deck? Did you read one of the initial articles of original Innistrad containing the flavorful backstory of the plane and notice it mentioned what could've easily been a legendary werewolf in card form? Notice that it said that werewolf is almost always in it's WEREWOLF FORM? If you answered yes to any of those questions get this out of this planet idea! Wait for it...wait for it...SINGLE SIDED WEREWOLVES. What do you say, you think they'll give us that legendary in a one-sided form? Please post answers.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 4:40PM #29
Symar
Date Joined: Jun 14, 2007
Posts: 809

Feb 3, 2012 -- 4:05PM, Leo-tech wrote:

This comment has nothing to do with this article.




Single- sided werewolves you say?


On topic, this was a neat article, seeing some of the commentary the cards got in development.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 03, 2012 - 5:45PM #30
Leo-tech
Date Joined: Oct 23, 2011
Posts: 62
You know what I mean. Those are old and they lack in werewolfishness.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing