|
1 year ago ::
Jan 25, 2012 - 5:49PM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Jun 24, 2008
|
This thread is for discussion of this week's Top Decks article, which goes live Thursday morning on magicthegathering.com.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 25, 2012 - 9:42PM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2010
|
I really love Modern. Lets me play my favorites in U/W control, from the lowly Condescend  to the godly Grand Arbiter Augustin IV  :D
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 25, 2012 - 9:44PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
May 17, 2009
|
Wirecat is my hero. I've been trying to make a very similar Loam deck work for a while, but his deck just has so much disgusting synergy. I'm building that deck as soon as I can.
Profile picture by Mackenzie Schubert www.plaincomics.com
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 25, 2012 - 11:11PM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Apr 16, 2007
|
Heck yes Raven's Crime.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 26, 2012 - 4:50AM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2007
|
What Nameless Inversion stays in GY ???
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 26, 2012 - 5:07AM
#6
|
- Jawsome UnCon Prizewinner
Date Joined:
Sep 22, 2003
|
I heart Death Cloud. That's the most fun looking decklist I've seen in a while.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 26, 2012 - 6:46AM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Aug 10, 2007
|
What Nameless Inversion stays in GY ???
When you cast it, it is removed from the graveyard and put on the stack. When it resolves or is countered it is put into the graveyard unless some other effect says otherwise (countered by a dismiss for instance).
The end result though is that in most cases, you can play it as many times as you'd like and have the mana for.
Also keep in mind, that if this is something you are worried about, Surgical Extraction may not do the job of dealing with it, as they can keep 2 mana up and respond to your extraction by playing the Nameless Inversion. When it resolves and is put back in the graveyeard it is considered a new object and your Surgical Extraction will fizzle for lack of a target.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 26, 2012 - 7:12AM
#8
|
Date Joined:
Mar 18, 2001
|
So why are we still calling those 2 decks "Affinity" when they have 0 cards in them with affinity? Is Metalcraft not as cool sounding?
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 26, 2012 - 7:22AM
#9
|
|
|
Just like how many fish decks don't play merfolk =)
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jan 26, 2012 - 11:46AM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Aug 25, 2003
|
Man, I want to play that Burning Vengeance deck. The synergies in that deck are amazing. I didn't even think of using Burning Vengeance like that before (hell, even our supposed resident Johnny in From the Lab didn't).
Zindaras' meta is like a fossil, ancient and its secrets yet to be uncovered. Only men of yore, long dead, knew of it.
|
|
|
