Community

 
Magic: The Gathering Magic General Would you be spending 14 hours perfecting mana...
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 23  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Would you be spending 14 hours perfecting mana in just one deck?
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 1:38PM #1
wickeddarkman
Date Joined: Dec 15, 2011
Posts: 473
If you would, I have a method for you to use, which may be cut down to 2 hours, but that will weaken it a little bit!

The advanced version DOES take about 14 hours.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 1:41PM #2
rulesinquisitor
Date Joined: Oct 7, 2010
Posts: 2,442
Go on...
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 1:52PM #3
ImissTheDuelist
Date Joined: May 21, 2010
Posts: 659
ive spent way more time then that tuning a deck as a whole.  just working on mana, i have a few tat prolly fall into that.   I constantly tune and adjust decks for various reasons, but i loove to build, test, tune, and re-test. a deck is never "finished" to me
:For autocarding, write [ c ] card name [ / c ]
You can also do [*c=lightning bolt]'Bolt[/c*] to get 'Bolt
sigged because I always forget to do it
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 2:49PM #4
ShardFenix
Date Joined: Mar 2, 2005
Posts: 2,346
14 hours on just a manabase seems a bit paranoid/OCD to be honest. 
I like fun, but competitive decks.  So I might not play what is optimal but they have normally been tested to have a 2/3 winrate.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 3:23PM #5
GoTexans
Date Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 8,006
Not really.
True post count: 9,900
Thanks Wotc for not counting archived posts.
If I post without capital letters than means I'm posting from my phone. For some reason it hates typing capital letters.
Go_Texans on MTGO.

Texans 12-4
Wildcard: W Texans 19 Bengals 13
Divisional: L Texans 28 Patriots 41
Another awesome season!
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 3:26PM #6
silasw
  • UnCon 3CM Master
  • Big Game Hunter
Date Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Posts: 5,760
If it's a computer program that takes 14 hours, then that sounds great. It seems hard to define what makes mana perfect, though.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 4:51PM #7
darkeshrine
Date Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Posts: 2,088
I spend about 15 minutes working on the mana base, though most of the time is finding the lands i need. I use a formula were % of mana cost colors = % of lands that produce those colors. Works great and takes about 5 minutes to count everything up. 

If it takes 14 hours, then your doing something wrong. 

Its going to eat me!

Quotes and such Show

Feb 21, 2012 -- 12:37PM, MTGKaioshin wrote:

Feb 21, 2012 -- 12:04PM, Nyktos wrote:

What happens if there's a tie for first?

Monkey knife fight


Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 7:40PM #8
Noukkers
Date Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: 186
I'd spend 10 minutes at first.

After that I'd fix it as I play test.

14 hours though? No thanks. At that point you should start optimizing your time instead of your mana base.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 7:53PM #9
Ihss
Date Joined: Jul 2, 2011
Posts: 525
There are enough multi-color lands in the game to create an efficient manabase for any deck. If it takes more than an hour to create a manabase for your deck, you're trying to do something crazy like play Seismic Assault , Mind Over Matter and Phyrexian Obliterator in the same deck.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Dec 26, 2011 - 8:27PM #10
MisterMelancholy
Date Joined: Aug 15, 2009
Posts: 2,154
It's taken me a few weeks to decide on my manabase for my mono-black deck:

2x Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth
3x Lake of the Dead
12x Swamp

It's a very agreesive, almost exclusively black manacost deck.  The highest manacost is 3, so don't even start about how Lake of the Dead kills my lands.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 23  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 Next
Jump Menu:
 
Magic: The Gathering Magic General Would you be spending 14 hours perfecting mana...
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing