Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Ulamog vs Counterspell
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:29PM #11
Chorsair
Date Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Posts: 3
ye and when I counter a spell (Ulamog) then none of this things happen because (if you read carefully)  "none of its effects occur"
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:29PM #12
Skibo_the_first
  • Forum Guide
Date Joined: Mar 13, 2004
Posts: 11,640

Nov 23, 2011 -- 1:21PM, Chorsair wrote:

lol ....countering a spell means that none of its effects ( why not trigger abbilities ?!) occur. so this trigger ability is usless cause it just won´t happen  (It doesn't resolve and none of its effects occur.)
and u can only cast Ulamog and thats what countering it removes all his abilities >.<[ quote="" br="" class="mbQuoteSpacer">

Trigger abilities are no "effects" of a spell.

… and then, the squirrels came.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:32PM #13
Skibo_the_first
  • Forum Guide
Date Joined: Mar 13, 2004
Posts: 11,640

Nov 23, 2011 -- 1:29PM, Chorsair wrote:

ye and when I counter a spell (Ulamog) then none of this things happen because (if you read carefully)  "none of its effects occur"




Trigger abilities are not "effects" of a spell.

YOu are trying to use semantical arguements for rules that are very clear. Trigger abilities and activated abilities exist independant of thier sources. THis is always the case.

… and then, the squirrels came.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:32PM #14
Novacat
Date Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Posts: 8,741

Nov 23, 2011 -- 1:29PM, Chorsair wrote:

ye and when I counter a spell (Ulamog) then none of this things happen because (if you read carefully)  "none of its effects occur"



You seem to misunderstand what the rules mean by "the effects of the spell." See my previous post. The exiling of a permanent is not an effect of the spell; it is the effect of a triggered ability that is on the stack independent from the spell. For example:

You control a Dragon's Claw , and you cast Lightning Bolt . The triggered ability from Dragon's Claw goes on the stack on top of Lightning Bolt , and countering Lightning Bolt doesn't remove that ability. The spell was cast, and the ability was already triggered. Neither of those facts are undone by the countering of a spell.

An "effect" results from the resolution of a spell or ability, or from a static ability. Countering Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre causes that spell's effect not to happen. However, the only effect it would have had is putting the permanent on the battlefield. THAT is the effect that countering it prevents.

Ever feel like people on these forums can't possibly understand how wrong they are? Feeling trolled? Don't get mad. Report Post.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:41PM #15
Brusko651
Date Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Posts: 1,665
I wonder..
Do the Comp. Rules actually say that somewhere or do you just kind of have to know these things.

For example, is it stated somewhere what they mean by "the effect" of a spell?

(this is more of a rules theory question, sorry.)
my new deck:
Bears with Weapons
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:46PM #16
Novacat
Date Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Posts: 8,741

Nov 23, 2011 -- 1:41PM, Brusko651 wrote:

I wonder..
Do the Comp. Rules actually say that somewhere or do you just kind of have to know these things.

For example, is it stated somewhere what they mean by "the effect" of a spell?



"Effects" actually has a rules entry.

Ever feel like people on these forums can't possibly understand how wrong they are? Feeling trolled? Don't get mad. Report Post.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:47PM #17
bay_falconer
Date Joined: Oct 12, 2010
Posts: 9,710
A ROE rules card actually says this happens with Emrakul ( Time Walk ) and her buddies Ulamog ( Vindicate ) and Kozilek (quad-cantrip), and Kozilek's artisan . What they don't tell you is the downside: If I piper out Emrakul or use Conspiracy to fetch her , I don't get the extra turn. Contrast with Wall of Omens , which is a cantrip every time my Sun Titan brings it back.

Jun 27, 2012 -- 12:04AM, GM_Champion wrote:

Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.


----
Autocard is your friend.

[c]Lightning Bolt[/c]
= Lightning Bolt
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:53PM #18
K-Mogg
Date Joined: May 15, 2001
Posts: 3,424
You may be confusing the effects of a spell with the Ulamog example.

If you cast Aura Blast , and it gets countered (by it's target being gone)
You will not draw a card.  The card draw is part of the spell, if the spell is countered, all of it is countered.

Ulamog has a triggered ability that triggers and goes on the stack as seperate object from the Ulamog spell.

These two items are independant, countering one will have no impact on the other.
MTG Rules Advisor
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 1:54PM #19
will_dice
Date Joined: Oct 18, 2009
Posts: 5,461

The effect of a resolving permanent spell (except for aura spells) is to move the card from the stack to the battlefield. This is the only effect a creature spell has.


608. Resolving Spells and Abilities


608.1. Each time all players pass in succession, the spell or ability on top of the stack resolves. (See rule 609, "Effects.")


608.3. If the object that's resolving is a permanent spell, its resolution involves a single step (unless it's an Aura). The spell card becomes a permanent and is put onto the battlefield under the control of the spell's controller.


609. Effects


609.1. An effect is something that happens in the game as a result of a spell or ability. When a spell, activated ability, or triggered ability resolves, it may create one or more one-shot or continuous effects. Static abilities may create one or more continuous effects. Text itself is never an effect.


610. One-Shot Effects


610.1. A one-shot effect does something just once and doesn't have a duration. Examples include dealing damage, destroying a permanent, putting a token onto the battlefield, and moving an object from one zone to another.


(Some cards may have a replacement effect being applied as they enter the battlefield, like Clone or Pouncing Wurm , but these are effects from the permanent, not the spell)

[<o>]
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Nov 23, 2011 - 2:18PM #20
Brusko651
Date Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Posts: 1,665
Ok I think that makes everything clear, thank you ^_^
my new deck:
Bears with Weapons
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing