Community

Someone who just netdecks potentially still cares about the way magic is played, because he's playing magic for a reason. That probably means he cares about mechanical interactions to some degrree. They'd also be more apathetic than "anti-melvin anti-vorthos".

Anti-melvin would probably seek to actively reduce mechanical complexity in the game. They'd support single-function cards. They'd be against work-arounds, solutions, and anything that twists the game around. That'd be an extreme ant-melvin, anyway.

Timmy, Johnny, and Spike are most identifiable by what /they/ care about. Pure Johnny is apparently alright with losing 9 games if on the 10th he gets to see his combo go off. Spike wants to win as many games as possible. Timmy does whatever Timmy does. It's never that straight-forward, but the classification apparently helps with card design.

I’ve removed content from this thread because Inappropriate Content is a violation of the Code of Conduct. You can review the Code of Conduct here:

wizards.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wizards.cfg...

Please keep your posts polite, respectful, and on-topic, and refrain from cussing.

Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in its place.