|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 6:10AM
#21
|
Date Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
|
Here's something I've never understood as far as tournament rules go, why allow infinite activation loops? A player should be rewarded for the interaction that infinitely looping activations create, but they shouldn't be allowed to use an arbitrary value, so why not 2? Double value for using the combo, but it makes them fair. That aside, I like the diversity of the decks in the top8, and even though I like to play active-control, with little to no regard for metagaming, many of the decklists look rather fun to get paired against (yes, even the deck that has a god-hand of Emerakul on t2). To be honest, I see this as a sign of success in the larger-than-usual banlist because it means the "Control is King" troupe took a massive kick in the pants. Hopefully as the format gets more comfortable with itself and slows down the balance will be restored (since obviously a Rock went 5-0 on day 1, which means the format isn't oppressively fast)
 Signature by
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 6:17AM
#22
|
Date Joined:
May 27, 2006
|
It's hard, no impossible actually to take seriously someone who thinks FoW is bad for Legacy and Vintage.  Doubt you find any player of these formats, Pro or otherwise who'd agree with you.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 6:28AM
#23
|
Date Joined:
Oct 23, 2010
|
It's hard, no impossible actually to take seriously someone who thinks FoW is bad for Legacy and Vintage. Doubt you find any player of these formats, Pro or otherwise who'd agree with you.
Well to be fair, FoW was a "bad card" once upon a time (mind you, it was compared to Mana Drain ), because it was hand disadvantage, until the game matured and by 2005 ("Type 1.5" aka Legacy is born) most people thought that the entire game was based on hand-advantage to make powerful combo finishes (to be fair though, the atrocious post-Scourge Onslaught standard, Mirrodin standard and Kamigawa standard didn't lend much against this.) But as far as SCG and GP/PT Legacy goes, FoW or GTFO tends to be the rule of thumb Will Modern be fine without FoW? Certainly.
 Signature by
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 8:03AM
#24
|
Date Joined:
Dec 15, 2009
|
It's hard, no impossible actually to take seriously someone who thinks FoW is bad for Legacy and Vintage. Doubt you find any player of these formats, Pro or otherwise who'd agree with you.
Well to be fair, FoW was a "bad card" once upon a time (mind you, it was compared to Mana Drain ), because it was hand disadvantage, until the game matured and by 2005 ("Type 1.5" aka Legacy is born) most people thought that the entire game was based on hand-advantage to make powerful combo finishes (to be fair though, the atrocious post-Scourge Onslaught standard, Mirrodin standard and Kamigawa standard didn't lend much against this.) But as far as SCG and GP/PT Legacy goes, FoW or GTFO tends to be the rule of thumb Will Modern be fine without FoW? Certainly.
FoW was never a bad card. Decks just didn't have the card drawing ability back then to recover from loosing a couple of cards unless it really meant you were going to loose, and combo wasn't really all over the place back then.
I like the match coverage from ggslive, but the commentary is bad and completely unprofessional, and often downright aweful.
It's only decent when someone like Kiblar gets up there between rounds and explains what the heck is going on in the tournament.
I would like to see wizards use the heck out of thier youtube channel to provide match coverage though.
For the record, I like Richard Hagon.
Edit: I will be upset if they only have cameras on one table.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 9:03AM
#25
|
|
|
Sooo... Sjöblom starts 12-0, is #1 on the standings for the whole day 2, only gets one feature match and doesn't get shown AT ALL in the top 8 webcast.
Does the coverage team have any idea what they are doing?
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 9:12AM
#26
|
Date Joined:
Oct 22, 2009
|
Ugh, having an hour long break 1hr15mins after you start is pretty ridiculous. Just have the lunch before you start broadcasting. You knew this format wasn't going to have 3hr long quarterfinals.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 9:14AM
#27
|
Date Joined:
May 27, 2006
|
Sooo... Sjöblom starts 12-0, is #1 on the standings for the whole day 2, only gets one feature match and doesn't get shown AT ALL in the top 8 webcast.
Does the coverage team have any idea what they are doing?
Showing the US players was more important to them. I don't like it either, but I wasn't expecting anything else.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 10:19AM
#28
|
Date Joined:
Oct 15, 2009
|
Anyone else not getting sound from the feed?
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 10:19AM
#29
|
Date Joined:
Oct 12, 2007
|
No sound no picture guys
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Sep 04, 2011 - 10:20AM
#30
|
Date Joined:
Jul 11, 2009
|
SOUND IS TOTALLY MESSED UP IN LIVE FEED!!
|
|
|