|
2 years ago ::
Aug 22, 2011 - 3:04PM
#21
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2008
|
I have to tell you, I'm running a standard discard deck right now, and Painful Quandry is more often than not the card that will turn a close game in my favor, and has pulled me out of many many tough spots. Forcing the opponent to pay additional costs on top of playing their own spells makes them much more frugal with them, and gives you a chance to pull ahead.
Actually I'm not sure how I forgot about Wurmcoil Engine, I will definatly run those over PO.
Painful Quandry is painfully easy to play around. As a bribery style card in the vein of Browbeat , Dash hopes and Temporal Extortion it is far too easy for a skilled player to punish you for letting THEM make the decisions and not YOU FORCING THEM ON THEM.
Boasts?
Show
2011 States Top 4 Designer of Top 8 States finishing MBC decks in 2011, 2010, and 2009 Standard Forum - Iron Deck Builder Season One Champ
"Against logic there is no armor like ignorance." - Laurence J. Peter "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.” - Oliver Wendell Holmes
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 22, 2011 - 4:26PM
#22
|
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2006
|
why you not play mind shatter?
what is wrong with you OP?
also if you really want to be a terrible person, play quest for the nihil stone so that you actually have a clock that doesn't cost alot.
since the guy should have no cards in hand if you actually play correctly, this card should be a sufficient way to kill the oppoent very fast.
I would be willing to try Mind Shatter in my sideboard, but the reason I'm not main-boarding it is because it's more or less useless against aggro decks. Most of the decks I've been seeing as the "big decks" have either been aggro or combo. I am constructing my main board around that assumption.
Also Quest for the Nihil Stone is a horrible card for this type of deck (it's not really a good card in the first place). The problem with it is that I would never actually want to draw it past turn 3. Once I have emptied their hand I won't be getting cards on it unless I can force them to keep cards in there hand (strangly enough that might mean that it can combo out with Painful Quandry , but this deck does not have room for cards that are useless lategame without a specific card on the field).
Painful Quandry is painfully easy to play around. As a bribery style card in the vein of Browbeat , Dash hopes and Temporal Extortion it is far too easy for a skilled player to punish you for letting THEM make the decisions and not YOU FORCING THEM ON THEM.
The thing that makes Painful Quandry differant than all the other cards you have named is that if the deck is working correctly by the time turn 5 has come around the other player shouldn't have many chances to pay one of the costs. In order to play around PQ you must either sacrifice cards/tempo or life, either of which is good for me. However if you keep sacrificing cards to it, you will eventually run out of cards, and then you either must slow down, or pay life, either of which, once again, is good for me. The other difference is that PQ is a continuous effect, while those other ones are one time effects.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 24, 2011 - 9:29PM
#23
|
Date Joined:
Nov 18, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 25, 2011 - 7:48AM
#24
|
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2006
|
Why Exsanguinate over Consume Spirit ? Also how important does Damnation end up being in your deck? (I noticed that you are running no spot removal at all)
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 25, 2011 - 11:17AM
#25
|
Date Joined:
Nov 18, 2003
|
To be honest, I choose Exsanguinate due to having blinders on. I have been playing EDH for the most part for the last couple years, and Exsanguinate is by far a better card in that format. In a one on one format, and especially in a mono black deck, the classic stand-by Consume Spirit is a better choice. Good call. As for spot removal, so far between Deathtouch , forced sacrifice , and mass-removal it has kept weenie boards from getting too dangerous. Abyssal Persecuter has been a beast so far, and I frequently can hold back a damnation to cast after I get my opponent's life down to zero.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 26, 2011 - 12:33PM
#26
|
Date Joined:
Apr 16, 2007
|
To be honest, I choose Exsanguinate due to having blinders on. I have been playing EDH for the most part for the last couple years, and Exsanguinate is by far a better card in that format. In a one on one format, and especially in a mono black deck, the classic stand-by Consume Spirit is a better choice. Good call.
Actually, I'm going to disagree with both of you (and considering his opinions on Painful Quandry...).
1. Exsanguinate doesn't target, this IS a big deal.
2. Corrupt is in the format.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 26, 2011 - 2:20PM
#27
|
Date Joined:
Nov 18, 2003
|
To be honest, I choose Exsanguinate due to having blinders on. I have been playing EDH for the most part for the last couple years, and Exsanguinate is by far a better card in that format. In a one on one format, and especially in a mono black deck, the classic stand-by Consume Spirit is a better choice. Good call.
Actually, I'm going to disagree with both of you (and considering his opinions on Painful Quandry...).
1. Exsanguinate doesn't target, this IS a big deal.
2. Corrupt is in the format.
Corrupt is a possibility to look at, but I cannot think of a deck I have seen proposed for Modern that runs a card that makes a player untargetable, thus making Exsanguinate relevant.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 27, 2011 - 7:20AM
#28
|
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2006
|
Actually, I'm going to disagree with both of you (and considering his opinions on Painful Quandry...).
1. Exsanguinate doesn't target, this IS a big deal.
2. Corrupt is in the format.
1. The ability to target only matters if the opponent has a way to make themselves untargettable (which would put a damper on any discard deck) or the ability to change targets, neither of which are common or even expected stratagies. I would think the ability to target a creature is worth more than the off chance a rogue deck might have the spell to mess with it.
2. Corrupt isn't as flexible of a card. I would have to wait until I had 6 mana, preferably all of it in the form of swamps (which precludes the use of non-basic lands) in order to use it. I agree that you might get more use out of it as a finisher, as it would deal 2 more damage than either of the other two (again only if you ran only swamps), but the ability to take out a troublesome creature when you haven't drawn any removal (or have already used it) without having to wait that long makes Consume Spirit much more versitile (and yes, I see that Corrupt can target creatures, but only after getting enough mana for it)
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 30, 2011 - 11:20AM
#29
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2008
|
Corrupt is ridiculously more flexible than Consume Spirit and Exsanguinate.
I wish you guys who don't know what they're talking about regarding black spells would just stop.
Also, I instantly regret bumping this thread.
Boasts?
Show
2011 States Top 4 Designer of Top 8 States finishing MBC decks in 2011, 2010, and 2009 Standard Forum - Iron Deck Builder Season One Champ
"Against logic there is no armor like ignorance." - Laurence J. Peter "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.” - Oliver Wendell Holmes
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Aug 30, 2011 - 11:44AM
#30
|
Date Joined:
Nov 11, 2009
|
Corrupt is ridiculously more flexible than Consume Spirit and Exsanguinate.
I wish you guys who don't know what they're talking about regarding black spells would just stop.
Also, I instantly regret bumping this thread.
This.
Also, have you figure out mono black for this format yet?
|
|
|