Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Switch to Forum Live View [M12-MCD] Sunpetal Grove cycle reprinted
2 years ago  ::  Jun 29, 2011 - 11:22AM #21
Hacimen
Date Joined: Oct 23, 2006
Posts: 8,375
AF specially said they were perfect for a core set, so I'll have to go with him on this one. I don't think the names are that specific, unlike the bounceland cycle which was guild-specific. But obviously something happened between the time he said that and his comments about painland types being undesirable for new players a little more than a year later.That said, under current philosophies it's hard to see just where those shocklands would be printed again.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 29, 2011 - 5:59PM #22
GeoleVyi
Date Joined: Jan 18, 2011
Posts: 807

Jun 29, 2011 -- 11:22AM, Hacimen wrote:

AF specially said they were perfect for a core set, so I'll have to go with him on this one. I don't think the names are that specific, unlike the bounceland cycle which was guild-specific. But obviously something happened between the time he said that and his comments about painland types being undesirable for new players a little more than a year later.That said, under current philosophies it's hard to see just where those shocklands would be printed again.




...

If not core, and if not expansion, then... mini-sets like commander and duel decks?

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 4:13AM #23
DrWorm
Date Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 4,897
They are servicable duals, and I already have a most, but I am rather dissapointed that they did not try a cycle of another future shited land.  Horizon Canopy and Nimbus Maze are really cool, and could add some new spice to the mix.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 4:18AM #24
DrWorm
Date Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 4,897

Jun 29, 2011 -- 11:01AM, milo_bloom wrote:

Remember, the names aren't as important for core sets



True, but having more general names is still better design in something that may go in a core set.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 4:20AM #25
watto
Date Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 949
wow...

M12 is going to get sold to nobody !!
enemy cycle would have been better and would be an insentive to buy m12, now they will go left unsold....

I'm really considering not going to the prerelease because 3/4 of the rares/uncommons are totally crap...and unless you get Chandra you will get a hard time getting you're money's worth.;(
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 3:11PM #26
Tigerguy786
Date Joined: Jun 4, 2011
Posts: 488
I like these. This will be my first chance to get them, too (barring just buying them, but I still like buying boosters). They will be handy if I ever decide to make a deck, or any combination of allied colors.

 
And there's the Creepy Doll
That always follows you
It's got a ruined eye
That's always open

And there's a Creepy Doll
That always follows you
It's got a pretty mouth
To swallow you whole
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 4:20PM #27
MrIndigo
  • Mr. Indigo
Date Joined: Mar 27, 2003
Posts: 13,416

Jun 30, 2011 -- 4:20AM, watto wrote:

wow...

M12 is going to get sold to nobody !!
enemy cycle would have been better and would be an insentive to buy m12, now they will go left unsold....

I'm really considering not going to the prerelease because 3/4 of the rares/uncommons are totally crap...and unless you get Chandra you will get a hard time getting you're money's worth.;(




Oblivion Ring, Reinforcements, Smallpox, Incinerate, Goblin Grenade, Phoenix, the Sphinx/Demon, etc.

There's plenty of chasable cards in this set. 

Nov 4, 2010 -- 9:11AM, Niche wrote:

Nov 3, 2010 -- 10:05PM, Razorgore wrote:

It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.



It should be about giving black cards to Niche.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 5:19PM #28
Uhhsam
Date Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Posts: 1,327
i still don't see why they don't make dual lands of all possible combinations with no drawback.  for a game that tries to encourage playing multiple colors, they just needlessly make it difficult to do so easily.  was it really so terrible back when they did have real duals? 
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 5:34PM #29
Wynzerman
Date Joined: Oct 23, 2010
Posts: 3,488

It's for the best (I know someone's going to give me a hard time about saying this), but it makes usable duels cheap, plain and simple. Wizards has to take liberties into taking their business beyond secondhand retailers to ensure people enjoy and endulge in their profit. The game is virtually unplayable at a constructed level without special lands because of the desparity between the options they create. The more cycles of cheap duels they make, the lower the cost of the average well built deck, the more people who will want to invest and play more heavily.


As for keeping enemy duel lands scarce, I suppose for the meantime we can only accept it as a flavorful choice in terms of them being enemy colors forced to interact. Maybe Innistrad will give us something in that regard? Or maybe one of the next premium sets will have Ravnica duels?



Signature by
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2011 - 6:25PM #30
fenthing
Date Joined: Sep 7, 2009
Posts: 87
I'm willing to bet that this is going to be the last reprint of the cycle for a long time. Just look at the original five walkers... they all got three standard legal printings and then got retired for a new cycle. Here's looking to M13 for something new. Also if we keep being multi-color free (light) until then we could see the shock lands rerprinted  in that core set and a return to Rav with ten rare slots freed up.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 7  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing