Community

Green is the color most appropriately associated with the natural world,  despite w/e else you may think; at the very least read Rosewater's  article.  If you don't like the color wheel, or his take, then you  simply don't like green as magic has outlined it.  That's fine, let's  just move on.  Green wants things to take a holistic and harmonic view  of the world, minimizing trying to rationalize, dissect, and otherwise  abuse the naturally occurring forces in the world, as well as the things  that happen to you that you have no control over.  It is certainly the  most stoic of the 5 colors - the least reactionary.

The problem for me is that Green's  philosophy, as described in Rosewater's articles, is either inadequately  defined or blatantly inconsistent. That leads to problems like the  Green Phyrexians: with an obviously hypocritical ideology. I think we  need to improve our depictions of Green. Green has a very strong  mechanical background, but we need to sit down and work a way to give  Green a good philosophical background too.

(Red has this problem on-and-off as well, to be fair. White, Blue, and Black are all pretty straightforward.)

(...)

So  we can offer alternate definitions like that. DavFlamerock has another  attempt in his signature, by willpell. That said defining Green in terms  of holism, as I think you're leaning towards and willpell explicitly  does, pretty obviously doesn't work either. Holism is far too vague a  concept and can fit into any colour capable of seeing the metaphorical  big picture.

(...)

You  can make some arguments that there are internal tensions in other  colours. Red has a constant issue with freedom: what if I use my freedom  to take away yours? That's why Red contains bullies and oppressors, and  freedom fighters and liberators. There's an internal clash.

There  are some others. White can end up in cases where its moral code demands  contradictory things: the whole lesser evil problem. Black can  encounter situations where self-interest requires Black to abandon its  own ideal of self-interest. Blue wants to be rational, but is unable to  rationally defend its own desire there.

For the most part these  internal conflicts are good. There are little fractures in every colour.  It is in responding to the problems posed by these fractures that we  see individuals' true mettle. But at the very least, in the cases of  White, Black, and Blue, you can produce coherent, internally consistent  interpretations of the colour. Red has a little more trouble, but I  don't think it's impossible. The essence of the colour is fine: WotC  just needs to depict it a little better. Red's problem is  implementation, not the basic ideas.

Green's issue is that its  internal conflict isn't just a little fracture at the edges, but an  immense ravine running through the very heart of the colour. Red has  issues with what freedom allows and if you can use freedom to restrict  freedom: but the idea is sound. White gets into problems when it starts  to worry about what morality actually dictates and under what  circumstances you can break your morality: but morality itself, as an  ideal, is unproblematic. Similarly for rationality and self-interest.  They lead to some issues, but they are not the issues themselves.

It's just... nature doesn't lead to some minor fringe issues. Nature is the issue.

Have fun! And stay nice children

Yep, the color pie is breached almost every set because it's not meant to handle specific cases.

As I understand this topic, we are not talking about specific cases. We are talking about Green in the abstract.

"White, what do you believe in?" "The betterment of the people."
"Blue?" "Progress."
"Black?" "Myself."
"Green?" "NATURE."
"Nature?" "Yes. Nature. The natural world around us."
"That's not an ethos. That's just existence. I believe in nature too. Because it exists."
"Yeah, but, you know... trees and stuff."

[nitpick] I'd quibble 'progress' for Blue. Progress has to be defined in terms of a goal. White wants social progress. Black wants to progressively increase its own power. Blue might answer that question 'the acquisition of knowledge' or somesuch.

[/nitpick]

Saying that green believes in nature is like saying that red believes in  fire and that blue believes in knowledge. Which is silly. These are  tools that they use, not beliefs.

I would say that Blue believes in knowledge, at least this far. Every other colour views knowledge as a tool. For Blue, knowledge is an end in itself. In terms of colour relationships, Blue likes Black and White because both of them understand how immensely powerful and important knowledge is and prioritise the methodical acquisition and application of knowledge: but both Black and White think that knowledge is instrumental. Black is always saying 'and how does this knowledge benefit me?' and White is always saying 'and how does this knowledge benefit everyone?'.

Blue, it seems to me, doesn't ask that question. Blue will say, 'But it's... it's knowledge. You don't need a reason to want it. You just do. Knowledge is an end in itself.'

(When I toyed with colour interviews of my own, I had the Blue character asked about this, and the response was just that curiosity is an innate drive. Sapient creatures are curious; that is, they seek knowledge. The drive is universal. Sure, some sapient creatures, e.g. goblins, are really bad at it, and that's why they're not going to learn much over the long term, but it is the inherent nature of intelligent beings to be curious.)

Green believes that there is a beauty in nature. It believes that in nature can be found all the tools a mage needs.
[...]
Green believes that the beauty in nature should be preserved.

Questions!

What is nature?

What is the difference between natural beauty and unnatural beauty?

To pick an example, consider the beauty of mathematics. (Wiki link because I'm lazy.) Is that natural beauty or not? Does Green appreciate it?

Intuitively it seems weird to say that Green likes mathematical beauty. Green is usually portrayed as very grounded, and the least abstract colour. Appreciating the symmetry of mathematics intuitively feels more Blue. But mathematical patterns illustrate the entire natural world. Green appreciates the beauty of natural things: does Green appreciate the beauty of the Fibonacci sequence?

is also pure spirituality. has monopoly over organised religion, but it is who genuinely feels that there is a higher purpose, a derivative of its hollistic world view. is the colour of druids, it is the colour of pagan imagery, and in Dominaria Gaea is real and is

(Fixing those colour-smilies is getting annoying...)

What is spirituality?

Haven't we agreed before that you can find religious/spiritual beliefs in every colour?