|
3 years ago ::
Oct 07, 2010 - 12:18PM
#281
|
|
|
Yeah people seem to not understand what a conspiracy is. But yes the judge or judges, and the opponent in question were in cahoots to DQ the victim player. The fact that the round record was altered is absolute proof of this. There is ABSOLUTELY no other reason to change the past round record of a tourney after other rounds are completed, and as far as I know such a thing has never been done in magics past before.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 07, 2010 - 2:12PM
#282
|
Date Joined:
Oct 10, 2007
|
It would probably be a good idea for those who hold themselves in high regards as being an intelligent contributor to do the following:
1. Understand basic organized layouts.
2. Understand basic spelling and grammar.
3. Understand the difference between bias and objectivism.
4. A basic knowledge of how the environment you are posting in functions.
5. What constitutes as an actual intelligent exchange of dialogue.
Through these means there can be intelligent discussions with intelligent people who care about the subject matter and it will weed out those who are just here to instigate trouble for no reason at all.
Allons-y!
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 07, 2010 - 2:25PM
#283
|
Date Joined:
Apr 10, 2009
|
Also, if 2 or more people plan or agree to do something, or act in combination to bring about a specific result - that's a conspiracy. Just so we're clear; the word means much more to many people.
Well if we're busting out our CJ degrees, "conspiracy" refers to a criminal act, which this is not. Cheating at a game of magic violates no laws, at worst, it's a civil matter.
But that's just me being pedantic because everyone here is now trying way too hard to not say "maybe you're right" and admit they might not be 100% correct with their guesses about this whole matter. And just to go back about 20 pages, it would appear I was wrong about some of the things I inferred and the judges weren't as off-base as I thought, though I still do believe they should be subject to more scrutiny, especially when DQing people, than they currently seem to be.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 07, 2010 - 2:31PM
#284
|
|
|
Due to complaints received about this thread, I've closed it. The thread will be reviewed to determine if it should be permanently closed, re-opened, and/or a new thread or threads created in its place
|
|
|
