Community

I must say that I'm excited about the Mind Swap Magic premise.  I enjoy swapping decks with my friends and giving their strategy a whirl.  Doing so midgame could be pretty sweet.  Of course, being the sometime griefer that I am, I'd be tempted to build a terrible deck incapable of winning on its own.  You know, along the lines of decks built around that enchantment (which name I cannot remember) that essentially has players switch libraries by exile-drawing cards.  I was going to build a deck with that and walls, but decided it would only win once per opponent, if I was lucky.

Anyway, a non-griefer strategy with such rules could be a lot of fun.

Jul 21, 2010 -- 11:04PM, Rainar wrote:

Why would you build a deck specifically for this format? I always like to play different formats with the same decks I always use.

I don't build decks specific to the format (singleton excepted, naturally).  I'm just saying as I would be the one introducing the idea to my group, I might this one time be the villain about it.  Usually I play my Forced Fruition Eightpost deck or BUW Wrath Reanimator for multiplayer.  Both can kill the table, but go about it in very different ways.  And neither even goldfishes fast, let alone actually win in any sort of reasonable time while defending, which is probably why they never get on me to take the decks apart.

It wasn't quite worth doing again, but we did try a double duel one day.  The idea was to defeat the one opponent sitting across, but all four of us were in the same game.  Unlimited range, but we could only attack the one opponent.  Basically, we wanted to play Star but were short a man.  It had a little of the same tension of, "Do I worry about that guy's plans?  Or should I just hope I can race their race?"  It was just too slow really.  Maybe had we just played with some sort of house rule that we were allowed to interfere with other duels going on, we'd still be doing it from time to time.  I'm going to suggest that.

Yeah, you get the same problem if repeatable abilities allow you to swap minds just by targeting, like Prodigal Pyromancer for instance. And spells; I think after they'd played it once or twice, players would start to cram their decks with instants, and you'd end up with one lucky player cycling round and round and waiting to draw an ultimatum. It might be better to introduce a new proxy card specially to facilitate mind swapping- something like a 3cc sorcery that says "at the beginning of your end step, swap minds with target opponent".

The real problem is with having the ability to swap minds repeatedly in the same board-state. How about having a separate, shared deck of cards with big casting costs; the top card is kept face up, and the first player to cast it gets to swap minds with whoever they want. It might be even more fun to say that the effect of the spell actually resolves; so, you might want to swap minds with someone you've just hit with a Beacon of Immortality , but how about a Lava Axe ? In fact, you could balance it by having low-cost spells with negative effects (like edicts, burn and discard; especially anything that allows the departing player to foul up the board for the new arrival!) and high cost spells with positive effects (life-gain, draw and creature buffs).

Mindswap could be really fun with Vanguard.

Me and my group play a multi-player variant called knight and traitors. its has become what we play almost exclusively. Its kinda like BANG but the rules are a little different. most notably the knights and the king are not on a team and the king wins when he reaches his 15th turn. I could post the rules if anyone is interested in playing it.