Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 20  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Bloodghast is a really bad card.
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:27PM #11
KageNoOni
Date Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 551

What about the rest of my arguments? Look at 2-drops as a whole. It meets efficiency requirements, is much more resilient than the Bears, and once you the opponent's life below 10 (easy to do in an aggressive deck) it can start attacking the turn you play the land.

If you like playing Magic casually (as opposed to very competitive play) join Casual Gaming.
You are Red/Blue!
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
I'm both rational and emotional. I value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, I'm innovative and intuitive. At worst, I'm scattered and unpredictable.

How to make a Deck List in HTML. If you miss the [deck] tag, check that link for another way. Easy copy/paste method.
WUBRGWUWBUBURBRBGRGRWGWGU2W2U2B2R2GSnow1234567890XTapUntap
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:31PM #12
ReleaseTheAnts
Date Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Posts: 2,277

Oct 10, 2009 -- 1:02PM, iamajellydonut wrote:


Unless you have an active sac outlet, Bloodghast is a really bad card. And I do mean sac outlet, not use.


Scarland Thrinax/Eldrazi Monument=Sac Outlet
Quest for the Gravelord/Blade of the Bloodchief=Sac Use


Bloodghast is victim to the same fate as Dash Hopes.


2/1 attacks into a 2/3. What happens? The 2/1 dies and the 2/3 lives. Next turn, Bloodghast comes back, attacks into the same 2/3 and it dies... Again. It will probably keep going like this for a while.


But what if I have something like Quest for the Gravelord that benefits from things going to the graveyard? Well, then they let the 2 damage through and go on with life. In the meantime, you're stuck with an "unblockable" 2/1 and a now useless card.


 


And because I know that this won't get through 90% of your skulls due to this being the Standard forums, think of this. Every time you draw/play Bloodghast, name a card you'd rather it be without thinking. You should have no problem coming up with a name.





I play Esper Mill... I hate the bastard

scrubnextdoor blog
Notable Stuffs Show
Champion of Niv's 1st Block Constructed Tournament
1000 posts & !-year anniversary 2/17/10 BOOYAH

Siggables Show
Neruka's Boyfriend Show
Kor Firewalker is SO HOT. He is the fire in my pants. I want his firewalking babies.


Oops Show

May 6, 2010 -- 9:08AM, useless_mancer wrote:

May 6, 2010 -- 3:57AM, ReleaseTheAnts wrote:

I just realized how large a pain in the ass it's going to be to break down regionals like this


but look on the bright side, [b]Ding Dong jund is dead[b], it's not the boogyman anymore XD


Razorgore Show

May 2, 2010 -- 9:34PM, Razorgore wrote:

May 2, 2010 -- 9:31PM, ReleaseTheAnts wrote:


Near Death Experience?


Gideon is not impressed by your triple white, incredibly difficult-to-manlipulate jank card.


Poor Niche Show

Jan 18, 2011 -- 11:22AM, Niche wrote:

MaRo keeps stabbing me in the face with cards like Phyrexian Rebirth. It's a black card.. with black art... in a white layer with white costs.

Up yours, design team.




Cryptic Command can go munch on a bowl of my nuts
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:34PM #13
iamajellydonut
  • UnCon Prizewinner 2008
  • …mmm
Date Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Posts: 7,229

Black Knight
Disfigure
Duress
Gatekeeper of Malakir
Quest for the Gravelord
Sign in Blood
Vampire Hexmage
Vampire Lacerator


There are 8 <=2cc cards that I would rather see on average over Bloodghast.

lel♯ jenk♯ ∞ Show


I'm the world's leading astrophysicist. You can trust me, because I said I was.

Oct 11, 2012 -- 9:16AM, Enigma256 wrote:

Oct 11, 2012 -- 8:50AM, Chaikov wrote:

What's wrong with my formating?

you make paragraphs shorter than the page width


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:35PM #14
iamajellydonut
  • UnCon Prizewinner 2008
  • …mmm
Date Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Posts: 7,229

Oct 10, 2009 -- 1:31PM, ReleaseTheAnts wrote:



I play Esper Mill... I hate the bastard




That's like playing Tempting Wurm and being angry when your opponent gets the better deal.

lel♯ jenk♯ ∞ Show


I'm the world's leading astrophysicist. You can trust me, because I said I was.

Oct 11, 2012 -- 9:16AM, Enigma256 wrote:

Oct 11, 2012 -- 8:50AM, Chaikov wrote:

What's wrong with my formating?

you make paragraphs shorter than the page width


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:44PM #15
KageNoOni
Date Joined: Jan 18, 2007
Posts: 551

You'd put Hexmage above Bloodghast? It dies to any removal, and doesn't have that recursive ability. The Hexmages are decent, but not up to par with Bloodghast due to that lack of resiliency. I'll give you Gatekeeper, due to forcing that sacrifice, not so quick to agree on the Lacerator though. Yes it's bigger, and can block, and cheaper, but it also is causing you loss of life, and dies just as easily as the Bloodghast, but lacks that recursive nature. The fact that it's a 2/2 for 1 makes it an excellent card, no argument, I'm not attacking the Bloodghast, but I would put it around the same level. Duress and Disfigure are removal, and serve different purposes, not comparable with the Bloodghast as you are basically comparing apples to oranges here. Black Knight at least is pro white, making it harder to path, but plenty of other removal still gets rid of him, and the vast majority of that removal is useless against the Bloodghast.

If you like playing Magic casually (as opposed to very competitive play) join Casual Gaming.
You are Red/Blue!
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
I'm both rational and emotional. I value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, I'm innovative and intuitive. At worst, I'm scattered and unpredictable.

How to make a Deck List in HTML. If you miss the [deck] tag, check that link for another way. Easy copy/paste method.
WUBRGWUWBUBURBRBGRGRWGWGU2W2U2B2R2GSnow1234567890XTapUntap
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:46PM #16
iamajellydonut
  • UnCon Prizewinner 2008
  • …mmm
Date Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Posts: 7,229

Oct 10, 2009 -- 1:26PM, DarkSunWolf wrote:


Oct 10, 2009 -- 1:20PM, iamajellydonut wrote:


He would probably be a lot happier if he played more resiliant or larger creatures, or if he drew more discard to protect his threats.




For 2 mana? What else would two mana get you?


Bloodghasts aren't the "all-star" creatures of the deck. They are a constant nuisance that draw kill spells and blocks. They make end-game useless land draws into a free creature or two or three. They scare people away from using Day of Judgement. They deal early, fast damage.


 




If you have 3xBloodghasts in the grave and your opponent is at 6 life? Well, for one thing, you could easily play much higher CC cards that late in the game. For another, you could build a better deck.


Mainboards shouldn't have that "lol :D" card. Every creature you draw should be one of those "all-star" creatures. The reason strict Vampire.decs are bad. Throwing in filler cards because you don't have enough decent ones with the word "vampire" on the typeline is a bad idea.


And how does Bloodghast scare people away from using DoJ? It's one thing to say that it makes it useless, but another to say that it scares them away. And QftGL > Bloodghast in this department.

lel♯ jenk♯ ∞ Show


I'm the world's leading astrophysicist. You can trust me, because I said I was.

Oct 11, 2012 -- 9:16AM, Enigma256 wrote:

Oct 11, 2012 -- 8:50AM, Chaikov wrote:

What's wrong with my formating?

you make paragraphs shorter than the page width


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:46PM #17
RPJesus
Date Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 15,149

Oct 10, 2009 -- 1:20PM, iamajellydonut wrote:


He would probably be a lot happier if he played more resiliant or larger creatures, or if he drew more discard to protect his threats.





Yeah, like a creature that wouldn't stay dead and kept eating removal spells. Wait...

Zammm = Batman.
Bronies unite.
"I'd call you a genius, but I'm in the room."
It's my sig in a box Show

Jul 29, 2012 -- 9:56PM, ChaosLight wrote:


Everything is better when you read it in Bane's voice.


Oct 18, 2012 -- 11:06AM, SteelWall wrote:

Your human antics and desire to continue living have moved me. Just kidding. You cannot move me physically or emotionally. Wall humor.


Oct 26, 2012 -- 8:17AM, Chaikov wrote:

Copy effects work like a photocopy machine: you get a copy of the 'naked' card, NOT of what's on it.



Dec 3, 2012 -- 10:18PM, Splattercat wrote:


Funny story:
InQuest Magazine (I think it was InQuest) had an oversized Chaos Orb which I totally rooked someone into allowing into a (non-sanctioned) game. 
I had a proxy card that was a Mountain with "Chaos Orb" written on it. When I played it, my opponent cried foul:

Him: "WTF? a Proxy? no-one said anything about Proxies. Do you even own an actual Chaos Orb?"
Me: "Yes, but I thought it would be better to use a Proxy." 
Him: "No way. If you're going to put a Chaos Orb in your deck you have to use your actual Chaos Orb."
Me: "*Sigh*. Okay."

I pulled out this huge Chaos Orb and placed it on the table. He tried to cry foul again but everyone else said he insisted I use my actual Chaos Orb and that was my actual Chaos Orb. I used it, flipped it and wiped most of his board.

Unsurprisingly, that only worked once and only because everyone present thought it was hilarious.


My DM on Battleminds:

no, see i can kill defenders, but 8 consecutive crits on a battlemind, eh walk it off.





Jan 15, 2013 -- 5:28PM, Iam_IronMan wrote:


Jan 15, 2013 -- 5:20PM, Jerrymm91 wrote:

Hi guys!  So, I'm a sort of returning player to Magic.  I say sort of because as a child I had two main TCG's I liked.  Yu-Gi-Oh, and Pokemon.  Some of my friends branched off in to Magic, and I bought two pre-made decks just to kind of fit in.  Like I said, Yu-Gi-Oh and Pokemon were what I really knew how to play.  I have a extensive knowledge of deck building in those two TCG's.  However, as far as Magic is concerned, I only ever used those two pre made decks.  I know how the game is played, and I know general things, but now I want to get in the game for real.  I want to begin playing it as a regular.  My question is, are all cards ever released from the time of the inception of this game until present day fair game in a deck?  Or are there special rules?  Are some cards forbidden or restricted?  Thanks guys, and I will gladly accept ANY help lol. 


I have the same problem with women.




Is this my new ego sig? Yes it is, other Barry Show


Jan 7, 2012 -- 6:59PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

And that's why you should never, ever call RP Jesus on being a troll, because then everyone else playing along gets outed, too, and the thread goes back to being boring.



Dec 2, 2012 -- 1:39PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

See, this is why RPJesus should be in charge of the storyline. The novel line would never have been cancelled if he had been running the show. Specifically the Slobad and Geth's Head talkshow he just described.



Dec 17, 2012 -- 4:27PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Not only was that an obligatory joke, it was an on-topic post that still managed to be off-topic due to thread derailment. RP Jesus does it again folks.




Feb 8, 2012 -- 4:40AM, ArtVenn wrote:

I think I'm gonna' start praying to Jesus... That's right, RPJesus, I'm gonna' be praying to you, right now.

O' Jesus

Please continue to make my time here on the forums fun and cause me to chuckle.

Amen.


Feb 17, 2011 -- 3:08AM, ArtVenn wrote:

Feb 16, 2011 -- 6:43PM, RPJesus wrote:

It was wonderful. Us Johnnies had a field day. That Timmy with the Grizzly bears would actually have to think  about swinging into your Mogg Fanatic , giving you time to set up your silly combo . Nowadays it's all DERPSWING! with thier blue jeans and their MP3 players and their EM EM OH AR PEE JEES and their "Dewmocracy" and their children's card games and their Jersey Shores and their Tattooed Tenaged Vampire Hunters from Beverly Hills


Seriously, that was amazing.  I laughed my *ss off.  Made my day, and I just woke up.


ArtVenn
You're still one of my favorite people... just sayin'.




Jan 11, 2012 -- 7:19AM, Salla wrote:

Jan 11, 2012 -- 4:37AM, Ogiwan wrote:


.....would it be a bit blasphemous if I said, "PRAYSE RPJAYSUS!" like an Evangelical preacher?



Perhaps, but who doesn't like to blaspheme every now and again?

Especially when Mr. RPJesus is completely right.


May 16, 2011 -- 12:18PM, Salla wrote:

I don't say this often, but ...

LOL



May 10, 2010 -- 7:37AM, AivaRuin wrote:



You... You... Evil something... I actualy made the damn char once I saw the poster...

Now you made me see it again and I gained resolve to put it into my campaign. Shell be high standing oficial of Cyrix order. Uterly mad and only slightly evil.

And it'll be bad. Evil even. And ill blame you and Lizard for it :P.



Jun 29, 2011 -- 11:05AM, Lineov wrote:

Jun 28, 2011 -- 2:44PM, Litmus wrote:



I'm trying to work out if you're being sarcastic here.  ...



Am going to stop you right there... it's RPJesus... he's always sarcastic


Jan 16, 2012 -- 11:37PM, febbstalicious42 wrote:

Jan 16, 2012 -- 11:35PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jan 16, 2012 -- 9:58PM, HeartlessNobody wrote:

we can only hope it gets the jace treatment...it could have at least been legendary


So that even the decks that don't run it run it to deal with it? Isn't that like the definition of format warping?


I lol'd.


Oct 26, 2011 -- 11:40PM, zammm wrote:

Oct 26, 2011 -- 7:43PM, TyGuy42 wrote:

Uktabi Orangutan What the heck's going on with those monkeys?

The most common answer is that they are what RPJesus would call "[Debutantes avert your eyes]ing."



Feb 9, 2012 -- 8:41AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:

Spoiler: Show

Feb 9, 2012 -- 7:45AM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Feb 9, 2012 -- 5:49AM, ORC_Ragnar wrote:

I’ve removed content from this thread because off-topic discussions are a violation of the Code of Conduct.

You can review the Code here: www.wizards.com/Company/About.aspx?x=wz_...

Please keep your posts polite, on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks. You are welcome to disagree with one another but please do so respectfully and constructively.

If you wish to report a post for Code of Conduct violation, click on the “Report Post” button above the post and this will submit your report to the moderators on duty.

...Am I the only one that thinks this is reaching the point of downright Kafkaesque insanity?



I condone the use of the word Kafkaesque. However, I'm presentely ambivalent. I mean, that can't be serious, right? We're April 1st, right? They didn't mod RPJesus for off-topic discussion when the WHOLE THREAD IS OFF-TOPIC, right?

Right.



Mar 9, 2012 -- 3:32PM, Garthanos wrote:

Mar 7, 2012 -- 4:54PM, RPJesus wrote:


Save or die. If you disagree with this, you're wrong (Not because of any points or arguements that have been made, but I just rolled a d20 for you and got a 1, so you lose).



Mar 19, 2012 -- 5:07PM, Kalnaur wrote:

Mar 19, 2012 -- 4:41PM, DoctorBadWolf wrote:


This just won the argument, AFAIC.



That's just awesome.



May 12, 2010 -- 9:36AM, JustTerrorIt wrote:

May 11, 2010 -- 5:46PM, Master_Yumyums wrote:

HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BEAR PRODUCING WORDS OF WILDING?!  WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME?!



That's what RPJesus tends to do. That's why I don't think he's a real person, but some Magic Card Archive Server sort of machine, that is programmed to react to other posters' comments with obscure cards that do in fact exist, but somehow missed by even the most experienced Magic players.

And then come up with strange combos with said cards. All of that is impossible for a normal human to do given the amount of time he does it and how often he does it.

He/It got me with Light of Sanction , which prompted me to go to RQ&A to try and find if it was even possible to do combat damage to a creature I control (in light that Mark of Asylum exists).



Dec 16, 2011 -- 10:16AM, HairlessThoctar wrote:


+10



Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:23PM, Eonblueapocalypse1 wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:13PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:02PM, tehbeast wrote:

heaven or hell.


Round 1. Lets rock.



GG quotes!

RPJesus just made this thread win!



Jul 25, 2012 -- 12:06AM, WhiteRaven810 wrote:

Jul 23, 2012 -- 6:26PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jul 23, 2012 -- 5:47PM, felisdomesticus wrote:


Blue players get all the overpowerered cards like JTMS.  I think it's time that wizards gave something to people who remember what magic is really about:  creatures.


Initially yes, Wizards was married to blue. However, about a decade ago they had a nasty divorce, and a few years after that they began courting the attention of Green. Then in Worldwake they had a nasty affair with their ex, but as of Innistrad , things seem to have gotten back on track, and Wizards has even proposed .



You are my favorite. Yes you. And moments like this make it so. Thank you RPJesus for just being you.



On what flavor text fits me:

Nov 15, 2012 -- 12:55AM, CadaverousBl00m wrote:

Surely RPJesus gets Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius ?



Sep 15, 2012 -- 4:24PM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


First: I STILL can't take you seriously with that avatar. And I can take RPJesus seriously, so that's saying something.



Sep 17, 2012 -- 1:31PM, Banderbear wrote:


I'd offer you a cookie for making me laugh but it has an Upkeep Cost that has been known to cause people to quit eating.



Jan 2, 2013 -- 7:46AM, royk wrote:



I you loads



Jan 20, 2013 -- 10:27PM, TV_Casualty wrote:

Jan 20, 2013 -- 10:17PM, RPJesus wrote:

"AINT NO LAWS IN THE SKY MOTHER****." - Agrus Kos, Wojek Veteran


10/10. Amazing.



Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:48PM #18
justicarphaeton
Date Joined: Apr 8, 2008
Posts: 132

Do you remember a little recursive black creature called Ichorid, waaaaay back from Torment?


I think we can all draw a lot of comparisons from Ichorid to Bloodghast.  Except Bloodghast is half of Ichorid's casting cost, and doesn't die at the end of your turn, in exchange for one less power and a slightly different recursive method.  But Ichorid was still great, because it could come back repeatedly and beat your opponent, given you had dead guys to exile.


Saying bloodghast is bad because it's for the most part a vanilla 2/1 for 2 mana is a silly argument.  Yes, it's vanilla when it hits the field.  Yes, there are situations where you'd rather be using something else.  But that can be said of many good cards.  The recursive factor means everything, and allows a player a certain edge when racing.  It's also good for board-sweeper recovery, and if it's PtE'ed, you at least get a land and your bigger finishers can't be hit by that PtE now.


The card isn't meant to have a mind-blowing effect; it's good in the way Tarmogoyf was good, by applying constant pressure to your opponent, who could ignore it and take a lot of damage, or remove it and be down one removal spell.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:58PM #19
DarkSunWolf
Date Joined: Dec 6, 2008
Posts: 27

Oct 10, 2009 -- 1:46PM, iamajellydonut wrote:


If you have 3xBloodghasts in the grave and your opponent is at 6 life? Well, for one thing, you could easily play much higher CC cards that late in the game. For another, you could build a better deck.


Mainboards shouldn't have that "lol :D" card. Every creature you draw should be one of those "all-star" creatures. The reason strict Vampire.decs are bad. Throwing in filler cards because you don't have enough decent ones with the word "vampire" on the typeline is a bad idea.


And how does Bloodghast scare people away from using DoJ? It's one thing to say that it makes it useless, but another to say that it scares them away. And QftGL > Bloodghast in this department.




By "not an all-star creature", I meant he's not going to take the spotlight in any one area, but he does his job, and does it well.


And I guess I shouldn't have said "scared away from" DoJ either, but if the board is locked and you draw a DoJ with opponent having bloodghasts on the field, it probably won't end up in your favor. If it's late-game you can bet he's been saving some swamps in his hand for that exact situation.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Oct 10, 2009 - 1:58PM #20
Crimson_Lancer
Date Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Posts: 6,552

It's another 2-drop that contributes to the Vamp-deck Godhand ending in a 4th-turn Nocturnis kill. The fact that it's recursive and can go hasty just means you don't feel stupid for playing it; it's better than Grizzly Bears and fits the deck.

Saying it sucks because "you shouldn't be playing Vampire.dec in the first place" is a horrible counter-argument, by the way. :S

Resident Logic Cannon
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 20  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 20 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing