|
3 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2010 - 8:43AM
#281
|
Date Joined:
Sep 17, 2005
|
The question of what happens with Necrotic Ooze  and Leveler cards has come up several times already.
Example:
community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/758...
Should this be added to the Specific Cards section of the FAQ?
This question keeps coming up. I've seen it several more times.
Another example:
community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/758...
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 10, 2010 - 4:15PM
#282
|
|
|
Necrotic Ooze, Infect, and Proliferate have been added to the appropriate FAQs. I'm still working on the RPRPrimer entry for Scars; expect that within a week or so.
And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2010 - 3:31PM
#283
|
|
|
The Rules Primer entry for Scars has now been added. Next step, finally getting that revamp up and done.
And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 24, 2010 - 11:22AM
#284
|
Date Joined:
Oct 20, 2004
|
The link to the Gatherer in the first post still goes to the old gatherer.
Also, it appears that inline text searches like those available in Firefox and Safari don't "see" text behind spoilers until it is revealed; this may hinder people looking for card specific FAQs etc.
ΦΦΦΦΦ
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 26, 2010 - 9:22PM
#285
|
Date Joined:
Sep 17, 2005
|
The card-specific entry for Painter's Servant  says that it changes the color of cards that are phased-out, which is not true anymore. Also, please add this question to that FAQ entry: community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/758...It hasn't come up a lot recently, but it's the most common one I've seen for Painter's Servant.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Oct 27, 2010 - 11:43AM
#286
|
|
|
Link fixed and question added. 
And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Nov 12, 2010 - 4:17PM
#287
|
Date Joined:
Oct 20, 2004
|
I think we need a Mimic Vat entry; it seem to be coming up a lot. Specifically, what happens when both players have a vat each. Along the following lines perhaps? Q. My opponent and I both control a Mimic Vat. During my turn, I cast Day of Judgement, and as a result two creatures are put into my graveyard from the battlefield, and two creatures are put into my opponent's graveyard from the battlefield. Both of our Mimic Vats trigger four times, once for each creature put into a graveyard. Who gets to imprint any given creature?
A. When multiple abilities need to be put on the stack at the same time, they get put on the stack in "AP-NAP Order". That means that first the Active Player (Alice) puts her abilities on the stack in any order, and then the Non-Active Player (Nigel) puts his abilities on the stack in any order. Since Nigel's abilities are put on the stack last, they will resolve first, and he can imprint each of the creature cards one at a time (putting all but the last one back into the graveyard). When Alice's abilities resolve, they will do nothing because the creature cards that went to the graveyard from the battlefield no longer exist (the ones put there from exile won't do any good because they are new objects as far as the game is concerned).
Of course, if Nigel forgets to order his abilities like this, or doesn't want any of the creatures because his Vat is already "occupied" by a creature he wants to keep, Alice will get her choice of which of the destroyed creatures she wants from those not taken by Nigel. Adding the Mimic Vat entry from the Set FAQ would probably also be useful.
ΦΦΦΦΦ
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Dec 12, 2010 - 1:32AM
#288
|
|
|
This FAQ has moved. To visit the FAQ in its new location, click here. This thread will now be closed.
And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary
|
|
|
~ 
~ 
~ 
~ 
