|
4 years ago ::
Jul 07, 2009 - 8:34AM
#31
|
Date Joined:
Jan 19, 2003
|
There is a new article today which has another summary of the M10 rules. Perhaps there are some tidbits we could pull from there and stick in here (though i don't have any specific suggestions at this time).
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 07, 2009 - 6:59PM
#32
|
|
|
Currently, if I attack with a 2/2 creature and giant growth it, my opponent can respond with a shock to kill my creature using the LIFO rules.
Does that change with M10? Will both the spells resolve and I end up with a 5/5 creature who has taken 2 damage?
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 07, 2009 - 7:18PM
#33
|
- Niftily helpful
- DCI Level 2 Judge
Date Joined:
Mar 16, 2001
|
That does not change. The Shock resolves first, dealing 2 damage to the 2/2, killing it. Then the Growth will be countered since its only target is now illegal.
Wizards.Com Boards Net Rep
DCI Level 2 Judge
Questions don't have to make sense, but answers do.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 07, 2009 - 7:29PM
#34
|
|
|
That does not change. The Shock resolves first, dealing 2 damage to the 2/2, killing it. Then the Growth will be countered since its only target is now illegal.
/shrug
The LIFO rule never really made sense to me.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 07, 2009 - 7:33PM
#35
|
Date Joined:
Sep 16, 2007
|
Currently, if I attack with a 2/2 creature and giant growth it, my opponent can respond with a shock to kill my creature using the LIFO rules.
Does that change with M10? Will both the spells resolve and I end up with a 5/5 creature who has taken 2 damage?
If you didn't see it in my summary, it probably isn't changing. I haven't listed Banding and Phasing there yet because it's unknown how they're changing; and I'm sure there are a couple of other tweaks, but a change that big would have been included in the article from weeks ago and thus would have been in my summary. 
(Just pointing something out for anyone who's thinking to ask if something big is changing.)
MTG Rules Advisor 
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 07, 2009 - 7:35PM
#36
|
Date Joined:
Sep 16, 2007
|
/shrug
The LIFO rule never really made sense to me.
EDIT - Never mind. I'll ask in PM. This isn't hte thread for that.
MTG Rules Advisor
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 08, 2009 - 1:34PM
#37
|
Date Joined:
Sep 16, 2007
|
Bumping so people make sure to read the entires for Banding and Phasing that I've just added. :D And I gotta say, I like the changes. :D
MTG Rules Advisor
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 08, 2009 - 2:18PM
#38
|
Date Joined:
Oct 13, 2002
|
You can't bump stickied posts!
All Generalizations are Bad
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 08, 2009 - 2:24PM
#39
|
Date Joined:
Sep 16, 2007
|
You can't bump stickied posts!
Not in the typical sense, no, but I can make sure that people see a new post in it (it doesn't show a change when only an edit is made). :D
MTG Rules Advisor
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jul 08, 2009 - 3:53PM
#40
|
|
|
The rules on Banding make sense and keeps it pretty close to its original functionality. I'm happy about that.
Am I the only person who still plays with Banding?
:D
|
|
|
