Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 12  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12 Next
Switch to Forum Live View ---**M10 Rules Changes Summary**---
4 years ago  ::  Jul 01, 2009 - 10:16AM #11
forty2j
Date Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 5,410

Kedar wrote:

[INDENT]Declaring Blockers now includes lining them up.

[INDENT]Another simple one, and it's exactly how it sounds. Once the defending player has declared blockers, the attacking player will take any creatures that are grouping up to block a single attacking creature and line them up in an order to receive damage. Before the second creature can be damaged at all, the first must be assigned lethal damage. This works like trample in that it takes into consideration other damage being assigned and other damage already on the creature.[/INDENT]


Dunno whether this is important enough to include in your summary or not.. but if a blocker has the ability to block multiple attackers, then the defending player lines up those attackers in the same way that the attacking player lines up blockers.

Rules Advisor.
Please autocard Show

[c]Dragon Fodder[/c] => Dragon Fodder
[c=Mycoloth]Nom nom nom[/c] => Nom nom nom

I am Blue/White Show
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 01, 2009 - 10:42AM #12
Kedar
Date Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 6,209

forty2j wrote:

Dunno whether this is important enough to include in your summary or not.. but if a blocker has the ability to block multiple attackers, then the defending player lines up those attackers in the same way that the attacking player lines up blockers.


Mmm, right, I'll include a mention about that.

MTG Rules Advisor
Mirrodin_Loyalty.png

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 01, 2009 - 11:11AM #13
Ahlyis
  • Mogic Puzzle Master
Date Joined: Aug 1, 2003
Posts: 10,454
One "terminology" change that you might want to include would be RFG->Exile since it is also a functional change.

No longer can the Wishes fetch cards from that zone since the Exile zone IS within the game whereas the old RFG zone was considered outside of it for the Wishes.
I'm just a Pigment of your imagination.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 01, 2009 - 11:13AM #14
Kedar
Date Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 6,209

Ahlyis wrote:

One "terminology" change that you might want to include would be RFG->Exile since it is also a functional change.

No longer can the Wishes fetch cards from that zone since the Exile zone IS within the game whereas the old RFG zone was considered outside of it for the Wishes.


Mmm, true that. I'd forgotten. Will add.

MTG Rules Advisor
Mirrodin_Loyalty.png

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 03, 2009 - 10:24PM #15
CBikle
Date Joined: Sep 13, 2004
Posts: 106

cyphern wrote:

Do you mean a link to the original announcement? If so, here is the URL:
[indent][noparse]http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/42a[/noparse][/indent]


Hyperlink to the rules page.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 04, 2009 - 4:10PM #16
FencePost
Date Joined: Nov 24, 2002
Posts: 133

Kedar wrote:

Note: Creatures in combat having first strike or double strike will still result in an extra combat damage step being inserted before the regular one.[/INDENT][/INDENT]


I'm just trying to interpret this. Does that mean that you can cast spells between the first strike and the regular damage step? Or that there just regular damage gets dealt after an SBE check goes though?

I ask because in Duels of the Planeswalkers, you can't cast anything in between.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 04, 2009 - 4:15PM #17
adeyke
  • Celestial Teapots are broken!
Date Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Posts: 9,378
You'll be able to play spells during the first strike combat damage step, after the first strike damage has been dealt.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 04, 2009 - 4:15PM #18
rivet1ea
Date Joined: Aug 31, 2008
Posts: 172
Not a big deal but there is a typo on the 3rd line of the 2nd paragraph under Combat Changes You have "as described above for the attacke lining up blockers." Attacke should be attack I believe also above that line you have "When one creature block multiples," block should be blocks.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 04, 2009 - 4:48PM #19
Kedar
Date Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 6,209

rivet1ea wrote:

Not a big deal but there is a typo on the 3rd line of the 2nd paragraph under Combat Changes You have "as described above for the attacke lining up blockers." Attacke should be attack I believe also above that line you have "When one creature block multiples," block should be blocks.


Whoops, thanks. Will fix (though 'attacke' should be 'attacker,' not 'attack').

MTG Rules Advisor
Mirrodin_Loyalty.png

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 04, 2009 - 4:50PM #20
Kedar
Date Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 6,209

FencePost wrote:

I ask because in Duels of the Planeswalkers, you can't cast anything in between.


Don't use DotP as a reference for any rule; if you have a question, come ask.

MTG Rules Advisor
Mirrodin_Loyalty.png

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 12  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing