|
5 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2008 - 11:02AM
#51
|
Date Joined:
Aug 30, 2007
|
I'm not seeing any "super-secret tech" against Q'n'T, even though it most assuredly exists.....
Website for my radio series: http://www.cyrusbalesfilms.co.uk/id2.html
For the facebook group of my radio series, search for "Who will save us now?" Please join!
Follow my regular articles on: http://www.manaleak.com/mtguk/
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2008 - 2:06PM
#52
|
|
|
I'm not seeing any "super-secret tech" against Q'n'T, even though it most assuredly exists.....
That's because Bant Control here is looking more and more LIKE QnT. Curious. So how does QnT beat QnT?
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2008 - 2:40PM
#53
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2003
|
I'm testing Guile+additional permission. If you're running Bant-Control-That-Looks-Like-Toast, you should just play Toast and get the Ultimatum and stuff on your team.
It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.
It should be about giving black cards to Niche.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2008 - 5:12PM
#54
|
Date Joined:
Mar 26, 2008
|
Hi! I tried making a rough Bant deck but i need some help... Here's the list so far. (Forgot how to make deck list tags) Akrasan Squire  x 4 Rhox War Monk  x 3 Stoic Angel  x 2 Chameleon Collosus  x 4 Battlegrace Angel  x 2 Archon of Justice  x 2 Hindering Light  x 4 Courier's Capsule  x 4 Oblivion Ring  x 3 Snakeform  x 3 Bant Charm  x 3 Wrath of God  x 2 Island  x 4 Forest  x 4 Plains  x 8 Seaside Citadel  x 4 Wooded Bastion  x 4 Not entirely sure on manabase so far and any help would be highly appreciated. TIA
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2008 - 5:14PM
#55
|
Date Joined:
Mar 25, 2007
|
we're more or less on equal footing with QnT creature-wise. if you can lay down a planeswalker like elspeth, the toast player would be hard put to deal with him. hindering light can counter shriekmaw or bounce effects from cryptic command, and faerie macabre can remove mannequin targets. i think the toast match-up is pretty even with draw quality mattering more than usual, just like the mirror matches of solarflare and dralnu du louvre in the past.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 05, 2008 - 5:29PM
#56
|
|
|
we're more or less on equal footing with QnT creature-wise. if you can lay down a planeswalker like elspeth, the toast player would be hard put to deal with him. hindering light can counter shriekmaw or bounce effects from cryptic command, and faerie macabre can remove mannequin targets. i think the toast match-up is pretty even with draw quality mattering more than usual, just like the mirror matches of solarflare and dralnu du louvre in the past.
Hindering cannot counter Shriek: it's a cip effect of a permanent, not an effect of a spell.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 06, 2008 - 4:28PM
#57
|
Date Joined:
Mar 25, 2007
|
Hindering cannot counter Shriek: it's a cip effect of a permanent, not an effect of a spell.
true. i guess i overlooked that part. what else can we SB against control variants though? there's sure to be a rise in QnT, solarflare and bant control. prolly some other control decks out there as well.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 06, 2008 - 4:54PM
#58
|
|
|
I just rode Elspeth to a win last night. 4/4 Flying Soldier each turn put him down, especially with enough counter back-up. Guile also won me a game, which was handy. Any deck that runs at sorcery-speed is hard pressed to deal with MrIndigo's list. I basically am running that, with few changes (no Mutavaults). A 28/28 flying Chameleon Colossus won me another game. That is hilarious. Bant Charm has proven absurd. Its counter ability won me many games.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 07, 2008 - 7:14AM
#59
|
Date Joined:
Oct 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 07, 2008 - 7:22AM
#60
|
Date Joined:
Apr 12, 2006
|
|
|
|
