Login | Signup

Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 117  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 117 Next
Switch to Forum Live View G/X Elves
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 1:57PM #21
xxmarinexx1
xxmarinexx1
Date Joined: Nov 3, 2007
Posts: 1,025
I'm not sure you need that much removal . Your deck seems to be inconsistent in two places, 1 Gilt-Leaf Palace and 1 Overrun ? You already have 3 Garruks and having 3 more gilt-leaf's is better than a combination of 3 forests and swamps.
" Black Lotus x4, Time Walk x4. and Mox Sapphire x4?, Maybe he is running the budget version"


---Standard---


Eldrazi Green

Red Deck Wins

Naya


---Extended---


Red Deck Wins
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 1:58PM #22
XSilenceX
XSilenceX
Date Joined: Feb 5, 2008
Posts: 47
i never get why people play 3 garruk wildspeaker* [one of my fav cards] in 3's and 1 random overrun? newsflash people Garruk can be Overrun after its been out for 1 turn. play 4 garruks, makes tokens, untaps lands, and of course Overun... my favorite card from lowryn
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 2:05PM #23
Velict
Velict
Date Joined: Feb 18, 2008
Posts: 1,081
Do you know that if two Garruks are on the board, they destroy each other as a State-Based Effect?

That's why we play 3.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 2:06PM #24
xxmarinexx1
xxmarinexx1
Date Joined: Nov 3, 2007
Posts: 1,025
Lol.
" Black Lotus x4, Time Walk x4. and Mox Sapphire x4?, Maybe he is running the budget version"


---Standard---


Eldrazi Green

Red Deck Wins

Naya


---Extended---


Red Deck Wins
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 2:14PM #25
XSilenceX
XSilenceX
Date Joined: Feb 5, 2008
Posts: 47
if you use garruk to overrun and kill garruk u have 3 more ready in ur mainboard.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 2:15PM #26
Velict
Velict
Date Joined: Feb 18, 2008
Posts: 1,081
It's still not a good thing to draw into several of them, especially in your opening hand.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 2:46PM #27
XSilenceX
XSilenceX
Date Joined: Feb 5, 2008
Posts: 47
i suppose you are right. but overrun costs 5 even if u have garruk use overrun and then play another then ur set. i mean even if u have an extra in ur hand its good to have a backup since ur opponent probably doest want you to have garruk on the field
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 2:48PM #28
Velict
Velict
Date Joined: Feb 18, 2008
Posts: 1,081
Oh, I'm not advocating playing Overrun in this deck, I'm just against playing 4 Garruks. I think Overrun is a bad card because it can be a terrible topdeck in many situations.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 3:11PM #29
XSilenceX
XSilenceX
Date Joined: Feb 5, 2008
Posts: 47
i agree.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Apr 27, 2008 - 4:10PM #30
Norbert
Norbert
Date Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 4,382

spandyrules wrote:

Here's my list:

Spoiler: Show

GB Elves
Land

4 x +[Gilt]+[Leaf]+[Palace]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Gilt-Leaf Palace Gilt-Leaf Palace &type=card">
4 x +[Llanowar]+[Wastes]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Llanowar Wastes Llanowar Wastes &type=card">
2 x +[Treetop]+[Village]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Treetop Village Treetop Village &type=card">
2 x +[Llanowar]+[wastes]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Llanowar wastes Llanowar wastes &type=card">
5 x +[Swamp]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Swamp Swamp &type=card">
6 x +[Forest]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Forest Forest &type=card">

Creatures

4 x +[Llanowar]+[Elves]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Llanowar Elves Llanowar Elves &type=card">
4 x +[Wolf]+[Skull]+[Shaman]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Wolf-Skull Shaman Wolf-Skull Shaman &type=card">
4 x +[Wren]+[s]+[Run]+[Vanquisher]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Wren's Run Vanquisher Wren's Run Vanquisher &type=card">
4 x +[Imperious]+[Perfect]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Imperious Perfect Imperious Perfect &type=card">
3 x +[Chameleon]+[Colossus]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Chameleon Colossus Chameleon Colossus &type=card">
3 x +[Wilt]+[leaf]+[Liege]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Wilt-leaf Liege Wilt-leaf Liege &type=card">

Instants/Sorceries

4 x +[Thoughtseize]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Thoughtseize Thoughtseize &type=card">
4 x +[Eyeblight]+[s]+[Ending]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Eyeblight's Ending Eyeblight's Ending &type=card">
2 x +[Profane]+[Command]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Profane Command Profane Command &type=card">

Artifacts/Planeswalkers

2 x +[Loxodon]+[Warhammer]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Loxodon Warhammer Loxodon Warhammer &type=card">
3 x +[Garruk,]+[Wildspeaker]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Garruk, Wildspeaker Garruk, Wildspeaker &type=card">
Sideboard
3 x +[Damnation]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Damnation Damnation &type=card">
3 x +[Extirpate]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Extirpate Extirpate &type=card">
3 x +[Cloudthresher]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Cloudthresher Cloudthresher &type=card">
3 x +[Krosan]+[Grip]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Krosan Grip Krosan Grip &type=card">
3 x +[Deathmark]+[c]" class="linkedCardName" target="_blank">x [c]Deathmark Deathmark &type=card">


I find it odd that you're using 4x Liege in a / build...I mean, it's still good, but...Also, I'm not sure about the 3x Garruk...I've tested him in Elves before, and I'm just not sure I like him all that much.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 117  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 117 Next
Post Reply
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing