Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 128  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 128 Next
Switch to Forum Live View MAGIC 2010 RULES CHANGES (4th thread)
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:29AM #1
WotC_Eric
  • Wizards of the Coast
Date Joined: Jul 21, 2006
Posts: 529
This thread is to continue the discussion found here: http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1202592

I sincerely apologize for having to keep moving the discussion around, we've seen stability issues in the past with threads that pass the 1,000 reply mark (which we've easily done 3 times now!).

Carry on!

Eric Sorensen
Wizards of the Coast
Organized Play

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:31AM #2
touchdown
Date Joined: Mar 18, 2005
Posts: 446
Hope to hear some word from the higher ups on all of our feedback so far.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:31AM #3
Dragon_Whelp
Date Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 4,448
They suck.
The Pony Co. Because none of us are as loving as all of us.

Contact info Show
In case contacting me over the forums is not possible for some reason or another, my email is morten.c.k.olsen@gmail.com. Please state who you are, because I will most likely end up ignoring people that I don't know at least somewhat.


Alwaaaaays, I wanna be with you! Show

May 2, 2011 -- 2:25AM, zammm wrote:

May 2, 2011 -- 1:59AM, Dragon_Whelp wrote:

You clearly overestimate my cognitive skills by assuming that I could have accumulated that knowledge independently.

Okay, I'll be sure not to make that kind of assumption in the future.

Now, if you'd like to go back to the main Magic General 'forum' page (that's the one that lists all the different 'discussion threads' that people have 'posted') from this page, just press the up-arrow key on your keyboard until you reach the top of the page, then click the link that says "Magic General"--it should be in fairly small font, just above the buttons labeled "Post Reply" and "Subscribe" and the box labeled "Jump Menu", but below the blue link labeled "Preferences". It'll be in a line with a number of other small-font links with different names.

From the 'forum' page you will be able to select another 'thread' to view; 'threads' that people have 'posted' to since you last looked at them will have their names listed in bold font and have the number of unread replies listed just to the right of the name. If you click that unread replies number, it will take you right to the last reply you viewed in the 'thread' so that you can continue reading all the new replies from there. To get back to the main Magic General 'forum' page, just repeat the process from the previous paragraph--don't worry if you're on a different page, all 'thread' pages will have the same basic layout, so it should work exactly the same on any page in the Magic General 'forum'.\

And remember, if you accidentally click on the wrong link and find yourself on a page you're not familiar with, there's no need to panic; you can always press the 'back' button in your browser to go back to whatever you were looking at before. It should be on the left-hand side near the top of the screen, just below the menu bar, and will probably have a picture of some kind of arrow pointing to the left on it.

Hope that helps!



Apr 17, 2011 -- 5:01PM, RPJesus wrote:

Apr 17, 2011 -- 4:49PM, IronMagus wrote:

The explanation given was that since land cards represent mystical bonds to far-off places rather than actual tangible things like creatures and other permanents, a person might have more than one memory of an area, or different mages could forge a bond to different parts of a place, etc. and that simply being a unique location doesn't necessarily mean that a land card has to be legendary.


"I remember my days as a schoolboy at the Tolarian Academy ..."
"Really? I went there too-"
"Wait don't- Well ****, there goes my childhood."



Mar 8, 2011 -- 9:51AM, DrWorm wrote:

I was clearly wrong about Dragon_Whelp, he clearly is a jerk.



Feb 25, 2011 -- 10:58AM, JustTerrorIt wrote:

Allow me to extrapolate—regular game play, as defined by WotC, is tournament play. As such, Casual, EDH, Planechase, and all that other stuff is irregular Magic; if Magic at all.

So the next time someone says Competitive Constructed decks are not the only decks that count in Constructed (Casual Constructed), then I can gleefully point to the definition set forth by WotC and say that Competitive Constructed is in deed the only ones that count, and that they are playing some irregular form of Magic.



Sep 27, 2010 -- 7:46AM, Hippie wrote:

Dragon, just don't argue with Hovercraft. He's his own Legacy metagame.



May 17, 2010 -- 10:17AM, JustTerrorIt wrote:

One with Nothing is the third iteration in an attempt to make Black Lotus fair:

Black Lotus : That's too good, we need to tone it down.
Lion's Eye Diamond : Dammit, players are still using it in a very broken manner!
One with Nothing : Alright! We got it now.



Twin2 wrote:

What happened to the really fun cards? Well you see a long long time ago the earth was ruled by dinosaurs. They were big so not a lot of people went around hassling them. Then a giant meteorite struck the earth, good bye dinosaurs. But what if the dinosaurs weren't all destroyed? What if the impact of that meteorite created a parallel dimension where the dinosaurs continue to thrive and evolve into intelligent vicious aggressive beings? What if they found a way back? ....wait that's not what happened to the fun cards that's the intro to the mario brothers movie. Get those two confused all the time, my bad.



May 13, 2010 -- 8:48PM, Qwyrxian wrote:

It's a folllow-up on the Priceless Treasures, Deadly Perils idea.  See, what happened was, you got the packs that the Eldrazi had already gotten to--the had annihilated everything but the land itself.

In fall, expect to open some packs and find cards covered in goopy, black oil. 

It's all about the marketing angle, people.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:32AM #4
ianL
Date Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 6

Qmark wrote:

My prediction is that this card will be roughly as lame and pointless as Mana Locusts.


I actually rather like Mana Locusts. I would play it. I'd build a milling deck that used the Locusts to generate cump blocking tokens to keep me allive while it and other spells eat my opponent's library.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:33AM #5
Newbunkle
Date Joined: Oct 11, 2007
Posts: 1,965
Keep the well thought out complaints coming.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:34AM #6
CyrusBales
Date Joined: Aug 30, 2007
Posts: 9,267
Another thread, quite impressive, must be some kind of community record! Does this change make MTGO easier to play/program at all?
Website for my radio series: http://www.cyrusbalesfilms.co.uk/id2.html

For the facebook group of my radio series, search for "Who will save us now?" Please join!

Follow my regular articles on: http://www.manaleak.com/mtguk/
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:34AM #7
OmegaM
Date Joined: Jun 14, 2006
Posts: 615
I haven't bought Magic cards in some time, but I'll probably go to the M10 prerelease just to get a feel for how these new rules work with a set designed for them (plus all the cards I've seen so far look pretty neat). In fact, if this is Magic's last hurrah, I might try going to an M10 booster draft a week to do my part in keeping the game alive.

I'm not sure yet if I'll do any Shards of Alara block drafts once the new rules start. It will be jarring seeing all the cards with "incorrect" wordings. >_>
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:37AM #8
Newbunkle
Date Joined: Oct 11, 2007
Posts: 1,965

OmegaM wrote:

I'm not sure yet if I'll do any Shards of Alara block drafts once the new rules start. It will be jarring seeing all the cards with "incorrect" wordings. >_>


Its not so bad. Some of my cards already have out-of-date text, but I still love them. :D

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:39AM #9
WotC_Eric
  • Wizards of the Coast
Date Joined: Jul 21, 2006
Posts: 529
*sigh*

Mentioning petitions, boycotts, etc. will get your post deleted as soon as it's noticed... PLEASE stop posting them.

Eric Sorensen
Wizards of the Coast
Organized Play

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 15, 2009 - 9:40AM #10
Falcon_Uk
Date Joined: Jun 15, 2007
Posts: 4,233

Drakkerne wrote:

Perhaps we'll stop posting when its common knowledge that not all the posters are knee jerk reacting, most of them have taken the time to analyze the new changes and comment independently on each one.


I agree that most of the posts now should be more reasoned and thought out given that it has been nearly 6 days since the new rules were announced. However, irrespective of the amount of changes people have to accept that nothing is going to happen in a hurry.

It will be interesting to see what people's comments are after they have played with the new rules for a year or so. I reckon Wizrds will wait until then (and after looking at Revenue figures) to see whether to reverse any of the changes.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 128  •  1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 128 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing