|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 7:56PM
#51
|
Date Joined:
Sep 26, 2007
|
Sorry, but no. First of all, I'm not the only person who's been working on this deck, so there's no way I could take all the credit. There have been a lot of people helping me make this deck.
Second of all, The Rogue Database seems like a bad idea to me. Having every different rogue deck in one place would just mean tons of confusion.
Thanks, but no thanks...
And this thread will continue to clutter up the forums and be completly and utterly useless. Horray!
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 8:00PM
#52
|
Date Joined:
Sep 26, 2007
|
You should probably add the following deck list to the sample deck lists considering it was created and tested by Patrick Chapin who made a appereance in the final rounds of Worlds 2008 and is known for great deckbuilding. Mono-Black Rogues4 x Nightshade Stinger  4 x Prickly Boggart  4 x Oona’s Blackguard  4 x Oona’s Prowler  3 x Bitterblossom  4 x Bad Moon  4 x Earwig Squad  4 x Marsh Flitter  2 x Shriekmaw  4 x Noggin Whack  1 x Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth  2 x Pendelhaven  4 x Mutavault  16 x Snow-Covered Swamp  Sideboard 3 x Nameless Inversion  4 x Deathmark  4 x Thoughtseize  2 x Pithing Needle  1 x Loxodon Warhammer  1 x Pendelhaven
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 8:12PM
#53
|
|
|
mono black rouge
lands - 22
4 scrying sheets
4 mutavault
14 snow-covered swamp
creatures - 24
4 prickly boggart
4 ooner's prowler
4 frogtosser banneret
4 oona's blackguard
4 earwig squad
4 stinkdrinker bandit
artifacts - 3
3 cloak and dagger
enchantments - 3
3 bad moon
spells - 8
4 thoughtseize
4 nameless inversion
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 8:32PM
#54
|
Date Joined:
Jul 22, 2007
|
And this thread will continue to clutter up the forums and be completly and utterly useless. Horray!
How is this thread completely and utterly useless? It's for discussing a specific deck... Not for every possible deck that has a rogue in it.... It's for actually having constructive discussion instead of confusion....
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 8:32PM
#55
|
Date Joined:
Oct 31, 2005
|
mono black rouge
lands - 22
4 scrying sheets
4 mutavault
14 snow-covered swamp
creatures - 24
4 prickly boggart
4 ooner's prowler
4 frogtosser banneret
4 oona's blackguard
4 earwig squad
4 stinkdrinker bandit
artifacts - 3
3 cloak and dagger
enchantments - 3
3 bad moon
spells - 8
4 thoughtseize
4 nameless inversion
Hows running with only 14 swamps working for you? I was running into some issues before with 18 swamps / 4 Mutavaults. Aside from that the rest looks pretty standard for a rogue deck.
Maybe
-1 Cloak and Dagger
+1 Bad Moon
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 8:35PM
#56
|
Date Joined:
Jul 22, 2007
|
mono black rouge
lands - 22
4 scrying sheets
4 mutavault
14 snow-covered swamp
creatures - 24
4 prickly boggart
4 ooner's prowler
4 frogtosser banneret
4 oona's blackguard
4 earwig squad
4 stinkdrinker bandit
artifacts - 3
3 cloak and dagger
enchantments - 3
3 bad moon
spells - 8
4 thoughtseize
4 nameless inversion
Looks pretty good... The mana looks a little painful though, I think you might need to run Urborg with that many colorless mana producing lands...
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 10:04PM
#57
|
Date Joined:
Jul 22, 2007
|
And this thread will continue to clutter up the forums and be completly and utterly useless. Horray!
Do you mind explaining how exactly this thread is "completly" useless? First of all, atma already gave our thread approval to be [Pre-Archetype] so it must not be that useless if we're official. Secondly, that database in my opinion seems to trivialize rogues. Regardless of win condition and play style, you're sticking every possible rogue deck in the same thread, and moreover you place The Rack and aggro decks in the same "section" for lack of a better word because, I assume, they have similar decklists. However, you have only one decklist for each, which adds to my point: each of those decks have potential and could use some other decklists and opinions with some discussion that isn't impeded by having to skim through every post to see if they're not talking about some other Rogue deck. Lastly, how is your post constructive at all? It's merely a blatant insult to our thread, which is quite unnecessary. We've had some exchange of ideas and deck critiques as well as reports on how our MBRA builds fare against some of the Decks to Beat. We're making progress and the way I see it, it would be more productive if we were to absorb your MBRA section.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 10:54PM
#58
|
Date Joined:
Sep 26, 2007
|
Do you mind explaining how exactly this thread is "completly" useless? First of all, atma already gave our thread approval to be [Pre-Archetype] so it must not be that useless if we're official. Secondly, that database in my opinion seems to trivialize rogues. Regardless of win condition and play style, you're sticking every possible rogue deck in the same thread, and moreover you place The Rack and aggro decks in the same "section" for lack of a better word because, I assume, they have similar decklists. However, you have only one decklist for each, which adds to my point: each of those decks have potential and could use some other decklists and opinions with some discussion that isn't impeded by having to skim through every post to see if they're not talking about some other Rogue deck. Lastly, how is your post constructive at all? It's merely a blatant insult to our thread, which is quite unnecessary. We've had some exchange of ideas and deck critiques as well as reports on how our MBRA builds fare against some of the Decks to Beat. We're making progress and the way I see it, it would be more productive if we were to absorb your MBRA section.
It was sarcasm. Take a look at the decklist i posted its extremely good, and i love this deck and will support it i am working on getting you guys some matchups so far Ive play mannequin and Kithikin aggro and gone 2-0 both against very good players.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 11:15PM
#59
|
Date Joined:
Jul 22, 2007
|
It was sarcasm. Take a look at the decklist i posted its extremely good, and i love this deck and will support it i am working on getting you guys some matchups so far Ive play mannequin and Kithikin aggro and gone 2-0 both against very good players.
Thanks for the decklist and the Explanation article thing in PM... At first I wasn't sold on it, but then i read the article.... i will list it, and I will test it out... Thanks...
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jan 26, 2008 - 11:16PM
#60
|
|
|
Looks pretty good... The mana looks a little painful though, I think you might need to run Urborg with that many colorless mana producing lands...
not a bad idea
|
|
|
