|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 12:51AM
#21
|
- Forum Guide
- Oh, the redhead said to shred the cello
|
hmm
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 12:58AM
#22
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2003
|
QnT always just felt like a bad Reveillark deck to me. It didn't really do anything similar...
It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.
It should be about giving black cards to Niche.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 6:51AM
#23
|
Date Joined:
Jul 19, 2007
|
Well based on that staggering statistic I'd say it still shouldn't count as a DtB. 10 isn't much higher than 6 considering the quantity of regionals that were held. Did anyone *win* a regionals with it? What was the list, as I think it'd be very important to post it here if we're trying to get this into the DtB sub-forum. Here are the decklists from Regionals. The link from SCG won't work for some reason, but you should be able to find the QnT decks pretty quickly.
And day 2 Hollywood isn't to be discounted, but I thought none of the lists even broke top 20? GWT got 13th and Bucher got 17th.
My single opinion is irrelevant in determining whether or not this is to become a DtB. But I am basing my evaluation on what I've read on stickies on how a deck becomes a DtB, not just conjecture. The sticky now just mentions tournaments results, but i do remember there being an old sticky before that said how DtBs were chosen. Maybe that one said something different.
As a final point, I only volunteered my local meta because its typically a perfect slice of a PT and it out-strips what we'd call a FNM in competitive play by leaps and bounds.... and while it wasn't meant to be an end-all be-all piece of evidence to support my point, the data I've collected (if you will) from it is relevant. But I won't mention it again. I agree that it is relevant. It is probably useful to the people discussing the deck. Its just that it isn't really important to deciding whether QnT deserves to go in the subforum.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 8:30AM
#24
|
|
|
This isn't in the DtB because the thread wasn't made.
I also believe you are missing the point that a DtB thread is there to help beginners learn about the decklist.
...that being said, I'm going to add this thread to the DtB, upon all cards in the OP being autocarded and under the stipulation that it will be made more pleasing to look at. I'll autocard them.
How would I make it "more pleasing to look at?" More bells and whistles?
Srsly, are dividers and banners really necessary?
When you think about it, they aren't. But as you wish, I'll add more things for aesthetics (sp?).
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 8:53AM
#25
|
Date Joined:
Jul 24, 2006
|
My list is trivially different from Joker's, and I haven't seen Arcengal's list since he won (or 2nd Placed, don't recall) Glasgow Regionals with it. http://sales.starcitygames.com//deckdat … ckID=25498
Pretty much the same as it was. No idea what I'd change for Eventide.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 8:58AM
#26
|
Date Joined:
Aug 10, 2009
|
Pretty much the same as it was. No idea what I'd change for Eventide. You add new filter lands.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 3:36PM
#27
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2003
|
You add new filter lands. Yeah, that's what Joker and I did. +2 Twilight Mire FTW.
It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.
It should be about giving black cards to Niche.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 7:49PM
#28
|
Date Joined:
Apr 13, 2008
|
Horray, Quick 'n Toast is now a DtB!
Umm, so I don't really frequent these forums any more, but I do blog for my website Greatplay.net.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 10:20PM
#29
|
|
|
Here's my latest list, in case I ever decide to run QnT at FNM again (aka let every single match go to time and extra turns). Quick 'n ToastLands - 2 x 4 4 x *Vivid Grove 4 x *Vivid Creek 4 x *Reflecting Pool 3 x *Flooded Grove 2 x *Mystic Gate 2 x *Sunken Ruins 2 x *Dreadship Reef 1 x *Fungal Reaches 1 x *Fire-lit Thicket Creatures - 1 x 6 4 x *Wall of Roots 4 x *Mulldrifter 3 x *Kitchen Finks 3 x *Cloudthresher 2 x *Chameleon Colossus Other - 2 x 0 4 x *Rune Snag 4 x *Cryptic Command 4 x *Firespout 3 x *Makeshift Mannequin 3 x *Careful Consideration 2 x *Slaughter Pact Sideboard - 1 x 5 3 x *Murderous Redcap 3 x *Mind Shatter 3 x *Primal Command 3 x *Teferi's Moat 1 x *Oona, Queen of the Fae 1 x *Chameleon Colossus 1 x *Kitchen Finks Oona's in there for decks that you know are running Terror and to swap out for threshers in matchups where it sucks. Colossus is a beating. And, oh yeah, he's the card that this deck can never let resolve against it anyways. More QnT decks should run him. If the manabase sucks, it's my problem because I'm horrible with those. EDIT: Forgot to sideboard Graveyard hate . I gotta figure out where that's going.
Current decks: Type II: B/R Vampires Extended: Modern: U/G Scapeshift 1.5: Ichorid, Elf Combo
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 26, 2008 - 11:52PM
#30
|
Date Joined:
Jun 14, 2008
|
QnT always just felt like a bad Reveillark deck to me. It looks more like a Big Mana deck to me, and it does the same types of things, but with more greedy mana base and control elements.
|
|
|