Community

00geist wrote:

Well since I am of the highly-opinionated sort and quite new to the game of magic.

In which case, it might be a good idea to stay out of a discussion that gets in depth into the Comp Rules, which are NOT intended for beginners. Just a suggestion.

00geist]Yes, a card can be two types sometimes, but they stay within the bounds of its subtype. For example, a land(a permanent) that can become a creature(a permanent), yet remains as a land. Or an artifact(permanent) creature(permanent). Thus your creature, due to the corresponding rules of each subtype, cancel the other out like a +1/+1 counter and a -1/-1 counter.

I have absolutely no clue what you are trying to say here. But any way that I look at it, is wrong. An Artifact Creature doesn't cancel any part of itself out. Not in any way shape or form. At least, not simply because it's an Artifact Creature.

Yes, a card can be two types sometimes, but they stay within the bounds of its subtype. For example, a land(a permanent) that can become a creature(a permanent), yet remains as a land. Or an artifact(permanent) creature(permanent). Thus your creature, due to the corresponding rules of each subtype, cancel the other out like a +1/+1 counter and a -1/-1 counter.[/quote]
I have absolutely no clue what you are trying to say here. But any way that I look at it, is wrong. An Artifact Creature doesn't cancel any part of itself out. Not in any way shape or form. At least, not simply because it's an Artifact Creature.

00geist]Another thing, on-the-stack is a temporary zone which goes away when spells resolve.

It does no such thing. The Stack is a zone which exists as long as the game is being played, whether there's anything on it or not. It doesn't "go away" when the last object on it resolves.

Another thing, on-the-stack is a temporary zone which goes away when spells resolve.[/quote]
It does no such thing. The Stack is a zone which exists as long as the game is being played, whether there's anything on it or not. It doesn't "go away" when the last object on it resolves.

00geist]Otherwise, the game would be in a stasis of sorts where neither player continues because there are no rules currently that support a "creature".

This partially makes sense (if you use the idea that since a Sorcery can't come into play it would get stranded on the stack), and is one reason why we've all been saying the current rules do not support such a thing.

Otherwise, the game would be in a stasis of sorts where neither player continues because there are no rules currently that support a "creature".[/quote]
This partially makes sense (if you use the idea that since a Sorcery can't come into play it would get stranded on the stack), and is one reason why we've all been saying the current rules do not support such a thing.

00geist]Asking about a sorcery creature is just nonsense at this time until the rules are updated for such a creation to exist. So in conclusion, every answer you will get is "an impossible monster".

Calling creatures "monsters" here will only arouse disdain from many of the frequent posters. They'll tell you to go back to playing Yu-Gi-Oh or something lik wrote: