|
1 year ago ::
Jun 05, 2009 - 11:14AM
#1
|
|
|
This thread is for discussion of this week's Making Magic, which goes live Monday morning on magicthegathering.com.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 9:06PM
#2
|
|
|
Does MaRo read PMO? The mystery continues.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 9:22PM
#3
|
|
|
Wow, lots of good questions answered well! Here's my responses to: Reprint Policy: C'mon MaRo. The spirit of the Reprint Polciy has been violated repeatedly. It started off covering nearly all rares and many uncommons, then became selectively chosen, then phased out completley, then retroactively revoked for several cards. If the reprint policy means so much, continue doing it. If not, scrap it. Honestly, it doesn't matter to me. I just can't fathom why of all things in the halls of WotC, the reprint policy is sacrosanct. Suspend not worth it? Noooooooooo! I love suspend and don't much care for Cascade! Impressing girls. VERY good answer! Being iconic for art. Man, I remember those days. No multicolour in the future. THANK YOU! Now, where's my enchantment block? Timeshifted cards. I love them. I hope that every single cards does get reprinted one day. I wait for the day that I finally understand what "Assemble" and "Contraption" are/does.
4ed Darkhawk
"You've got to kick at the darkness until it bleeds daylight..."
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 9:24PM
#4
|
|
|
wolfv @maro254 what would stop you from ever making a set that completely lacks a single color?
The fact that it would be a terrible idea. Magic is many things to many players. Our job as designers is to make sure that every set has something for everyone. One of the ways we do that is to make sure that lovers of each color get something cool in each set. This would be hard to do if we left a color out.
Your question does hit a more important point though. Should we do things that players never see coming from time to time? Absolutely. One of the joys of Magic is that the game keeps evolving, and the designers get to use this opportunity to do things that are unexpected. A reply like this on a question about color? Uh oh... here comes purple!
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 9:34PM
#5
|
|
|
i'm really happy that he went over the flash/faerie situation. given their unpopular tournament supremacy, i think it's hard for people to see how fun and flavorful flash really was with faeries (when you weren't running a competitive faerie deck), which explains the unbalanced way flash was given to blue in that block. i am hoping green gets its share of good flash cards in the near future.
Three, one of which is a planewalker that's appeared previously.[/quote] blue/white jace?
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 9:35PM
#6
|
|
|
blue/white jace? Nah, more like green-white Bolas.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 9:44PM
#7
|
|
|
With the amount of time spent on talking about how the next set will contain 'Purple', I wouldn't call that 'unexpected'.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 10:10PM
#8
|
|
|
I loved this article. It's good to know that we have the ear of the Head Designer of the game we all play. If government communication from constituent to administration worked half as efficiently as Magic Player <-> MaRo does, the US would be a much different place. @Zendikar comments: Mysterious and cool, but no dinosaurs, pirates or ninjas?  Good that we get more 'walkers though.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 10:20PM
#9
|
|
|
Because not everything can be evergreen. Yes, cycling is awesome and it does all sorts of great things, but the only keyword mechanics we've chosen to make evergreen are creature mechanics that are very flavorful and have enough design space to be used every set. Cycling may not be flavorful, but it has more design space than any other mechanic in Magic, since almost any card can have cycling added to it at the cost of a slight reduction in its power level. It doesn't define the set it's in; it's a simple workhorse mechanic. It would make more sense to me if R&D treated cycling as a tool like multicolored or hybrid rather than as a mechanic, even though the rules say it's a mechanic.
Honestly, no. Hurloon Minotaur, as a mascot, proved much more popular internally than it ever did externally. The reason why? I'll be blunt—the card's pretty bad from a power perspective, and that's before R&D decided that the overall power level of creatures could be juiced a little. Yes, the art's great, but iconic cards nowadays have to not just look good but be good as well. *cough*Lord of the Pit *cough*
Green gets it because it's the creature color and has the biggest, bad-assiest (I hope time credits me with that word) creatures. Then why is blue still the color of Huge Fatties That Are Hard To Deal With? Shroud is part of green's slice of the color pie, but the biggest (mono-)green creature with shroud is Kodama of the North Tree , while blue gets Inkwell Leviathan (which, as far as I can tell, is mechanically a green card except for its artifact-ness).
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Jun 07, 2009 - 11:02PM
#10
|
|
|
will Mike Turian's question start a running joke in R&D of developers asking mark who his favorite is every time they need an ego boost?
This is the happy swamp. Love it. I am red/blue, I think logically and act impulsively.
|
|
|