|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 12:38AM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Aug 29, 2008
|
I am developing a deck to defeat most popular decks and almost all weird decks that can come about on a consistent basis. It is never before seen, and it has been under construction for some time now. All the secrets to it have been discovered on my own, I have not seen this idea implemented. I am creating it for one purpose: States. So I am keeping it under wraps until then. I am asking for someone to help me fine tune it. Message me or write in the thread, and I will choose the best to help me. Here's the brief stats for the deck:
Destroys Faeries, its absolute favorite matchup.
Destroys Quick 'n Toast, a very nice matchup.
Loves Red, but not easy.
Most other decks have very little testing for VeJi DaY, so that's where my lab testing partner will come in.
Creativity is key. Being creative leads to mind-boggling discoveries. Being a great player can lead to proper structure.
The best one chosen will have access to a very nice deck for their States, with no knowledge of the deck available to any opponent, giving it some extra percentage points for winning, if they so choose to play it. I may call upon multiple people, but I am asking for trustworthiness, for I am myself very trustworthy, so I ask the same from my testing companions. Thank you very much.
- VeJi
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 1:07AM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Oct 14, 2007
|
*holds up a "Trolling Ahead" sign*
Not interested. Good luck though.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 1:57AM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Jun 17, 2008
|
Need moar credibility
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 2:11AM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Aug 29, 2008
|
I have NO credibility at all. NONE. I don't need any to be creative and be a great player. And proof is not a necessity, for there is no risk involved. The only thing that can happen is you will have knowledge of a new deck that perhaps could win you States because it doesn't exist, and even with knowledge of it it may still be > 50% against most decks.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 2:29AM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Jun 17, 2008
|
You don't need credibility to be creative and be a great player, true. You need at least some credibility or some proofs if you want people, especially those "Best" you need, to take you seriously. That said, there is no risk involved indeed. For all I know you could be right and win states and I'm missing on a big opportunity. If so, well good luck to you 
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 2:32AM
#6
|
Date Joined:
Aug 29, 2008
|
You don't need credibility to be creative and be a great player, true.
You need at least some credibility or some proofs if you want people, especially those "Best" you need, to take you seriously.
That said, there is no risk involved indeed. For all I know you could be right and win states and I'm missing on a big opportunity. If so, well good luck to you
Please don't use my nice guy strategies to defeat me and my purpose, which is:
A) Fully develop deck in time for States
B) Help someone or multiple people have success at their States
Have an enjoyable evening.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 2:41AM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Oct 18, 2008
|
Message the deck.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 2:42AM
#8
|
Date Joined:
Oct 14, 2007
|
Sarnath'd version:I'm inclined to heavily disagree with you on the awesomeness of this tech, but I'll reserve those feelings for the time being. My citation to this is how often you claimed to have switched decks in the Uncon tourney (which is something I hated, but was fair game). Either you were doing heavy pruning on one deck after just one match, switching decks to a perceived match, or yanking everyone's chain. I'm hoping for the neither the former nor the intermediate.
I'm not at all badgering you to find out the "super secret tech", for that part of it is of no interest to me at this time. I'm just trying to figure out how you can claim to be a great player and a great designer yet have no credibility. There may be no risk except for free time, but with an unknown reward which could be close to none (I'm inclined to believe it not the case, but I can't wholeheartedly take either side) it's not something I care to take on.
.... I'm talking in circles so I'll end it the same way I ended my last post here: Good luck and have fun!
The side of me that is interested in helping people: If this arrogant blabber hasn't scared away the boogeyman and you are still considering this side of me (the insomniac who got off of an 15 hour shift), you can ask anyone on the team I'm on if I'm decent. My posts are as open as the Midwest and I can always give pointers even if I don't see what it is. I'll let you know I'm dead-set on the deck I'm piloting for States, but I'm definitely not above helping a fellow player.... g'night. My account doesn't log off so... yeah...
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 3:05AM
#9
|
Date Joined:
Aug 29, 2008
|
Sarnath'd version:I'm inclined to heavily disagree with you on the awesomeness of this tech, but I'll reserve those feelings for the time being. My citation to this is how often you claimed to have switched decks in the Uncon tourney (which is something I hated, but was fair game). Either you were doing heavy pruning on one deck after just one match, switching decks to a perceived match, or yanking everyone's chain. I'm hoping for the neither the former nor the intermediate.
I'm not at all badgering you to find out the "super secret tech", for that part of it is of no interest to me at this time. I'm just trying to figure out how you can claim to be a great player and a great designer yet have no credibility. There may be no risk except for free time, but with an unknown reward which could be close to none (I'm inclined to believe it not the case, but I can't wholeheartedly take either side) it's not something I care to take on.
.... I'm talking in circles so I'll end it the same way I ended my last post here: Good luck and have fun!
The side of me that is interested in helping people: If this arrogant blabber hasn't scared away the boogeyman and you are still considering this side of me (the insomniac who got off of an 15 hour shift), you can ask anyone on the team I'm on if I'm decent. My posts are as open as the Midwest and I can always give pointers even if I don't see what it is. I'll let you know I'm dead-set on the deck I'm piloting for States, but I'm definitely not above helping a fellow player.... g'night. My account doesn't log off so... yeah...
I appreciate your post. I was building unrefined decks for the tournament for the purpose of testing. I know that people in the tournament will use good decks and play well, so I can get good practice in. My sideboards were messy, and so too was my manabases. I had great competition, but I myself didn't have one refined deck to play with, and obviously luck can change a lot. What that means was sometimes I got a little unlucky, but then again, I would have had to of gotten pretty lucky to win the thing. That's was raw builds will do. And little testing because of lack of competition. That's why I'm recruiting for someone that can help the deck and themselves.
I want someone who likes creativity.
Enjoy your well deserved rest.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Oct 19, 2008 - 3:16AM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Aug 29, 2008
|
Message the deck.
I will be doing this to the one I choose. I'm not making this a competition or anything, I just have no other way to find the best. In order to retain the deck's secret, I have to abstain from telling anyone other than my testing partner.
|
|
|
