|
5 years ago ::
Jul 16, 2008 - 12:43PM
#1
|
|
|
This thread is for discussion of this week's Swimming with Sharks, which goes live Thursday morning on magicthegathering.com.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 16, 2008 - 10:22PM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Nov 27, 2005
|
Interesting stuff and, looking at DeckCheck, it seems the Fae are rampant outside of the US as well. However, the thing about the UK meta is that there isn't one, really. Each PTQ seems to have its own local mini-meta, whatever the format. It's really hard to read, and you just have to test against a decent gauntlet then go along with a deck you feel comfortable with.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 16, 2008 - 11:31PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Mar 18, 2007
|
Why didnt we discus either of the other TWO winning strategies from last couple of weeks? No look at the folk list or the other non fae winner?
Owner of TheCardNexus chain on mtgo.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 1:01AM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Jul 17, 2008
|
Why didnt we discus either of the other TWO winning strategies from last couple of weeks? No look at the folk list or the other non fae winner? Well, we all know that Faeries is the only deck that matters in this metagame.
That's why.
He should have mentioned the Elementals deck, though. If I remember right, that particular deck only ran one Soulstoke, which is a very interesting move in this metagame.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 6:29AM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Jun 14, 2006
|
It's interesting that, despite the dominance of Faerie decks, each of the PTQs covered in this article had a non-Faerie deck in the top 4. Does this suggest that Faeries are more beatable than the results graphs show?
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 7:31AM
#6
|
|
|
The R?B deck he talked about insnt an aggro deck BTW. its a control deck. I should know, I was the one who top 8'ed with it.
"Someday, someone will best me. But it won't be today and it won't be you."
I <3 RDW
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 8:45AM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Aug 15, 2007
|
Awww... No love for the Elementals decks. I was hoping I'd get some kind of shoutout for my 2nd place deck in Nashville with the Knollspine Invocation in the board, which totally wrecked the Fae all day long. In fact, it wrecked the eventual winner in the finals in the one game of the match that I didn't have to mull to 5. I do like the various Shamans builds, but I don't think anyone's really hit on the best combination just yet, though (at least that I've seen).
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 8:48AM
#8
|
Date Joined:
Sep 25, 2007
|
The R?B deck he talked about insnt an aggro deck BTW. its a control deck. I should know, I was the one who top 8'ed with it. I don't see where he said it was an aggro deck.
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 8:51PM
#9
|
|
|
So, I'm curious, what is the one deck that has an advantage against the faeries deck?
|
|
|
|
5 years ago ::
Jul 17, 2008 - 8:52PM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Jul 17, 2008
|
It's interesting that, despite the dominance of Faerie decks, each of the PTQs covered in this article had a non-Faerie deck in the top 4. Does this suggest that Faeries are more beatable than the results graphs show? Faeries is beatable, of course. Even Affinity pre-bannings was beatable in Block Constructed. They share the fact that they are consistently the best deck in the format, though.
|
|
|