Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
7/17/2008 SWS: "Playing Ketchup"
2 years ago  ::  Jul 16, 2008 - 12:43PM #1
WotC_Monty
Posts: 1,341
Date Joined: 11/05/03
This thread is for discussion of this week's Swimming with Sharks, which goes live Thursday morning on magicthegathering.com.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 16, 2008 - 10:22PM #2
Zaccix
Posts: 19
Date Joined: 11/27/05
Interesting stuff and, looking at DeckCheck, it seems the Fae are rampant outside of the US as well. However, the thing about the UK meta is that there isn't one, really. Each PTQ seems to have its own local mini-meta, whatever the format. It's really hard to read, and you just have to test against a decent gauntlet then go along with a deck you feel comfortable with.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 16, 2008 - 11:31PM #3
fatguy_poolshark
Posts: 235
Date Joined: 03/18/07
Why didnt we discus either of the other TWO winning strategies from last couple of weeks? No look at the folk list or the other non fae winner?
Owner of the fatbot chain on mtgo.
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 1:01AM #4
Mountains
Posts: 493
Date Joined: 07/17/08

fatguy_poolshark wrote:

Why didnt we discus either of the other TWO winning strategies from last couple of weeks? No look at the folk list or the other non fae winner?


Well, we all know that Faeries is the only deck that matters in this metagame.

That's why.

He should have mentioned the Elementals deck, though. If I remember right, that particular deck only ran one Soulstoke, which is a very interesting move in this metagame.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 6:29AM #5
OmegaM
Posts: 511
Date Joined: 06/14/06
It's interesting that, despite the dominance of Faerie decks, each of the PTQs covered in this article had a non-Faerie deck in the top 4. Does this suggest that Faeries are more beatable than the results graphs show?
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 7:31AM #6
Prophet24
Posts: 77
Date Joined: 06/02/07
The R?B deck he talked about insnt an aggro deck BTW. its a control deck. I should know, I was the one who top 8'ed with it.
"Someday, someone will best me. But it won't be today and it won't be you."

I <3 RDW
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 8:45AM #7
chibimateo
Posts: 8
Date Joined: 08/15/07
Awww... No love for the Elementals decks.

I was hoping I'd get some kind of shoutout for my 2nd place deck in Nashville with the Knollspine Invocation in the board, which totally wrecked the Fae all day long. In fact, it wrecked the eventual winner in the finals in the one game of the match that I didn't have to mull to 5.

I do like the various Shamans builds, but I don't think anyone's really hit on the best combination just yet, though (at least that I've seen).
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 8:48AM #8
IthilanorStPete
Posts: 2,686
Date Joined: 09/25/07

Prophet24 wrote:

The R?B deck he talked about insnt an aggro deck BTW. its a control deck. I should know, I was the one who top 8'ed with it.


I don't see where he said it was an aggro deck.

Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 8:51PM #9
Coolmagics
Posts: 7
Date Joined: 10/07/07
So, I'm curious, what is the one deck that has an advantage against the faeries deck?
Quick Reply
Cancel
2 years ago  ::  Jul 17, 2008 - 8:52PM #10
Mountains
Posts: 493
Date Joined: 07/17/08

OmegaM wrote:

It's interesting that, despite the dominance of Faerie decks, each of the PTQs covered in this article had a non-Faerie deck in the top 4. Does this suggest that Faeries are more beatable than the results graphs show?


Faeries is beatable, of course. Even Affinity pre-bannings was beatable in Block Constructed. They share the fact that they are consistently the best deck in the format, though.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Post Reply
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing