<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Class Restrictions vis Surface Action</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75890/28634107/Class_Restrictions_vis_Surface_Action</link><description>Here is the revised Class Limitations list (researched and provided to us by Weedsrock2; thanks for tackling this). I've included Mike's notes so everyone can see his reasoning on some of these choices. Changes are underlined. Please review and comme</description><item><title>That's an interesting thought. I would agree if I thought 1) they would bother rescale it and make a new mold (very expensive) as a reprint, and 2) I was confident there are going to be enough sets going forward to see it again.Overall, it is usually</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75890/28634107/Class_Restrictions_vis_Surface_Action?post_id=513530373#513530373</link><description>That's an interesting thought. I would agree if I thought 1) they would bother rescale it and make a new mold (very expensive) as a reprint, and 2) I was confident there are going to be enough sets going forward to see it again.Overall, it is usually</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:59:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd rather have a misscaled Dragon and a Java instead of c correct Dragon...The correct scale for the D-class could have come with a later "reprint"I think we all have different tastes, but I would think that a list that is updated with each new set</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75890/28634107/Class_Restrictions_vis_Surface_Action?post_id=513513041#513513041</link><description>I'd rather have a misscaled Dragon and a Java instead of c correct Dragon...The correct scale for the D-class could have come with a later "reprint"I think we all have different tastes, but I would think that a list that is updated with each new set</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 01:35:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I personally think a change in funnels is enough to 'justify' a new sculpt let alone the turrets. If you really want to point out a past 'mistake' the Renown/Repulse is a much more obvious one IMO.But just because previous mini's have taken more 'lic</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75890/28634107/Class_Restrictions_vis_Surface_Action?post_id=513499703#513499703</link><description>I personally think a change in funnels is enough to 'justify' a new sculpt let alone the turrets. If you really want to point out a past 'mistake' the Renown/Repulse is a much more obvious one IMO.But just because previous mini's have taken more 'lic</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:04:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>My bad. Good point. And another reason they differ enough to not be counted together.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75890/28634107/Class_Restrictions_vis_Surface_Action?post_id=513499185#513499185</link><description>My bad. Good point. And another reason they differ enough to not be counted together.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I do not doubt that Fuso and Yamashiro share similar abilities and Effingham would warrant different stats.Its just that Yamashiro and Fuso had visible OPTICAL differences (turret orientation), but share the same mold.In the same way I think Effingha</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75890/28634107/Class_Restrictions_vis_Surface_Action?post_id=513474777#513474777</link><description>I do not doubt that Fuso and Yamashiro share similar abilities and Effingham would warrant different stats.Its just that Yamashiro and Fuso had visible OPTICAL differences (turret orientation), but share the same mold.In the same way I think Effingha</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:32:15 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
