New Posts For Thread: Multiclassing, but which style?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29809631/Multiclassing,_but_which_styleSo obviously NEXT will have multiclassing. But it occured to me that there are several approaches.In the beginning, D&D had, instead of multiclassing, hybrid classes to represent the approach other races took to adventuring, such as the Elf class, aIt's really a matter of opinion/preference.As a diehard multiclasser who is rarely even willing to play a pure class anything, I think the final state of 4e multiclassing is by far better than 3.5 multiclassing. Hybrid works great for blending two clhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29809631/Multiclassing,_but_which_style?post_id=529927943#529927943It's really a matter of opinion/preference.As a diehard multiclasser who is rarely even willing to play a pure class anything, I think the final state of 4e multiclassing is by far better than 3.5 multiclassing. Hybrid works great for blending two clSun, 17 Mar 2013 17:36:16 -0500Although personally not a fan of Multi-classing ( I prefer using Backgrounds, Specialties, and Internal Build Choices to customize your PC ) I was in fact quite excited by the thought of multi-classing when it was first previewed for 3rd edition. I ehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29809631/Multiclassing,_but_which_style?post_id=529902441#529902441Although personally not a fan of Multi-classing ( I prefer using Backgrounds, Specialties, and Internal Build Choices to customize your PC ) I was in fact quite excited by the thought of multi-classing when it was first previewed for 3rd edition. I eSat, 16 Mar 2013 18:00:12 -0500Its not just organic feel levelling up... because it is mostly off camera... so rationalizing it up to a point isnt hard ie some training montage works ok. Its actually game wise it creates problem when one part of the system assumes a certain amounhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29809631/Multiclassing,_but_which_style?post_id=529901739#529901739Its not just organic feel levelling up... because it is mostly off camera... so rationalizing it up to a point isnt hard ie some training montage works ok. Its actually game wise it creates problem when one part of the system assumes a certain amounSat, 16 Mar 2013 17:29:37 -0500Its not just organic feel levelling up... because it is mostly off camera... so rationalizing it up to a point isnt hard ie some training montage works ok. Its actually game wise it creates problem when one part of the system assumes a certain amounhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29809631/Multiclassing,_but_which_style?post_id=529900117#529900117Its not just organic feel levelling up... because it is mostly off camera... so rationalizing it up to a point isnt hard ie some training montage works ok. Its actually game wise it creates problem when one part of the system assumes a certain amounSat, 16 Mar 2013 16:33:44 -0500That is pretty much just 3e multiclassing. The problem that poeple are rightfully bringing up is: Why wouldn't you take a single level of rogue/fighter/barbarian to get all of those frontloaded abilities? Especially when you start looking at levelhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29809631/Multiclassing,_but_which_style?post_id=529896119#529896119That is pretty much just 3e multiclassing. The problem that poeple are rightfully bringing up is: Why wouldn't you take a single level of rogue/fighter/barbarian to get all of those frontloaded abilities? Especially when you start looking at levelSat, 16 Mar 2013 14:17:31 -0500