<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 4Next</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29800869/4Next</link><description>Like many here I like the design approach of DDN but I think that WOTC have a very partial view about the benefits and nature of 4th edition. They seem to have a very atomistic view of 4th ed seeing its as a collection of discrete mechanics, whereas</description><item><title>Ironically, that would be a "two pronged approach" like the one notoriously used in the 80s, so even trying to split into both retro and progressive would be retro.  There's no escaping it. ;)Seriously, though, it would have been a good idea.  The pr</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29800869/4Next?post_id=529708865#529708865</link><description>Ironically, that would be a "two pronged approach" like the one notoriously used in the 80s, so even trying to split into both retro and progressive would be retro.  There's no escaping it. ;)Seriously, though, it would have been a good idea.  The pr</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:32:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Can I come around to your place for a beer and reading session? I could quite happily sit at a desk and read though all of that until I was done.[/quote]Well, we could probably arrange something at some point in the future. The next half year or one</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29800869/4Next?post_id=529699711#529699711</link><description>Can I come around to your place for a beer and reading session? I could quite happily sit at a desk and read though all of that until I was done.[/quote]Well, we could probably arrange something at some point in the future. The next half year or one</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 10:08:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I am not looking for other Brand.I'am disapointed that WOTC dont keep the best part of 4ed. 4ed is not a complete mistake.I have always run homebrew setting. I dont care about legacy of old mechanics of Dnd.But I do understand that it's crucial for s</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29800869/4Next?post_id=529699321#529699321</link><description>I am not looking for other Brand.I'am disapointed that WOTC dont keep the best part of 4ed. 4ed is not a complete mistake.I have always run homebrew setting. I dont care about legacy of old mechanics of Dnd.But I do understand that it's crucial for s</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:52:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>IMO it's because they need to either make executive decisions on which direction they want to go,  or create pre-4th and 4th edition variants of DDN.  Trying to mix the two isn't making for a stronger product,  they need to split it and let the marke</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29800869/4Next?post_id=529689117#529689117</link><description>IMO it's because they need to either make executive decisions on which direction they want to go,  or create pre-4th and 4th edition variants of DDN.  Trying to mix the two isn't making for a stronger product,  they need to split it and let the marke</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:34:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I got a little exposure to d20 Modern via S&amp;SS's Gamma World, and it was pretty aweful.  What I saw of d20 Modern wasn't that great, either.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29800869/4Next?post_id=529689033#529689033</link><description>I got a little exposure to d20 Modern via S&amp;SS's Gamma World, and it was pretty aweful.  What I saw of d20 Modern wasn't that great, either.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:28:56 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
