<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Why not standardize the mental stats?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766365/Why_not_standardize_the_mental_stats</link><description>How come we don't standardize the effects of the mental stats across classes? Currently, a significant portion of the benefit of high mental stats is determined by what spellcasting class you are. Wizards get a boosted spell DC with a higher intellig</description><item><title>Currently the majority of spell saves are running off DEX, CON, WIS. With four spells saving with CHA. NO spells saving with STR or INT. So all stats are not applying saves. So the argument that "they are all saves" is false. Im amazed so many people</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766365/Why_not_standardize_the_mental_stats?post_id=529186921#529186921</link><description>Currently the majority of spell saves are running off DEX, CON, WIS. With four spells saving with CHA. NO spells saving with STR or INT. So all stats are not applying saves. So the argument that "they are all saves" is false. Im amazed so many people</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:14:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Use Magic Devices still wasnt removed from Rogue? zzz</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766365/Why_not_standardize_the_mental_stats?post_id=529158359#529158359</link><description>Use Magic Devices still wasnt removed from Rogue? zzz</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:51:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Charisma: I really like tying this stat to magic item usage, as the packet experiments with. Make it clear to players that many magic items require a sort of personality clash, and so players with high CHA can use magic items better. There should not</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766365/Why_not_standardize_the_mental_stats?post_id=529158013#529158013</link><description>Charisma: I really like tying this stat to magic item usage, as the packet experiments with. Make it clear to players that many magic items require a sort of personality clash, and so players with high CHA can use magic items better. There should not</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 02:04:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It may help to consider how often specific attributes are added to actual rolls (or otherwise impacted by rolls).STR and DEX are used nearly every character in every combat situation. Outside of combat, CON is typically less useful, but STR and DEX s</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766365/Why_not_standardize_the_mental_stats?post_id=529157943#529157943</link><description>It may help to consider how often specific attributes are added to actual rolls (or otherwise impacted by rolls).STR and DEX are used nearly every character in every combat situation. Outside of combat, CON is typically less useful, but STR and DEX s</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:54:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I took what you said as evocative of a use of charisma beyond attempting to alter the attitude of an NPC. Some DMs will apply ad hoc penalties to those with low charismas, such as lowering the starting attitude of an NPC. Granted, this was a part of</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766365/Why_not_standardize_the_mental_stats?post_id=529020607#529020607</link><description>I took what you said as evocative of a use of charisma beyond attempting to alter the attitude of an NPC. Some DMs will apply ad hoc penalties to those with low charismas, such as lowering the starting attitude of an NPC. Granted, this was a part of</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:59 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
