<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Duel Implement Spellcaster question.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766101/Duel_Implement_Spellcaster_question.</link><description>I have my Tome Caddy running loose helping my summoned creature and I'm wielding my Quarterstaff two-handed for the Hafted Defense Feat. If I use Duel Implement Spellcaster and my Familiar's Book Bearer Benefit which implement is considered as off ha</description><item><title>Nothing specific to sorcerors; it's just that they natively get staffs and daggers as implements.  Since they are also weapons, things like Eberron Dragonshards can be used with them (have to be attached to a weapon), and they can have weapon enchant</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766101/Duel_Implement_Spellcaster_question.?post_id=529022867#529022867</link><description>Nothing specific to sorcerors; it's just that they natively get staffs and daggers as implements.  Since they are also weapons, things like Eberron Dragonshards can be used with them (have to be attached to a weapon), and they can have weapon enchant</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:19:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Now it makes sense! Thanks.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766101/Duel_Implement_Spellcaster_question.?post_id=529020303#529020303</link><description>Now it makes sense! Thanks.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:49:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Still new to this forum so I am unfamiliar with doing multiple quotes." Except that this isn't the way dual wielding works in 4e.  You can hold a [1h] weapon in each hand all you want, and you can attack with either.  But unless you have something th</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766101/Duel_Implement_Spellcaster_question.?post_id=529007217#529007217</link><description>Still new to this forum so I am unfamiliar with doing multiple quotes." Except that this isn't the way dual wielding works in 4e.  You can hold a [1h] weapon in each hand all you want, and you can attack with either.  But unless you have something th</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:07:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Except that this isn't the way dual wielding works in 4e.  You can hold a [1h] weapon in each hand all you want, and you can attack with either.  But unless you have something that says you attack with both weapons, you don't, and they don't add dama</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766101/Duel_Implement_Spellcaster_question.?post_id=528989131#528989131</link><description>Except that this isn't the way dual wielding works in 4e.  You can hold a [1h] weapon in each hand all you want, and you can attack with either.  But unless you have something that says you attack with both weapons, you don't, and they don't add dama</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:17:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The way I read the feat and the what I believe is the intent of said feat is to make the spell caster very much like a dual wielding warrior.  With a weapon in each hand he/she is trying to inflict maximum damage.I do not believe that a tome bearer w</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29766101/Duel_Implement_Spellcaster_question.?post_id=528984375#528984375</link><description>The way I read the feat and the what I believe is the intent of said feat is to make the spell caster very much like a dual wielding warrior.  With a weapon in each hand he/she is trying to inflict maximum damage.I do not believe that a tome bearer w</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:08:43 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
