<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Weight of weapons</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29729677/Weight_of_weapons</link><description>I understand that this is not an important issue at all.And I understand that D&amp;D is never anything near realistic.But I think make it more realistic would be a better way to go. At least it would be less being regarded as a laughable joke.Take the w</description><item><title>Everyone acknowledges weaponw eights are off.  They have been since the game was released 40 years ago.  On the plus side, encumberance rules are off proprtionally.  Unless they fix it (which I hope they do) assume 1 D&amp;D pound equals &frac12; real-wo</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29729677/Weight_of_weapons?post_id=528449003#528449003</link><description>Everyone acknowledges weaponw eights are off.  They have been since the game was released 40 years ago.  On the plus side, encumberance rules are off proprtionally.  Unless they fix it (which I hope they do) assume 1 D&amp;D pound equals &frac12; real-wo</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:46:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Good luck on that, please do not hold your breath.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29729677/Weight_of_weapons?post_id=528447391#528447391</link><description>Good luck on that, please do not hold your breath.</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:29:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Agreed. But I'm going to pretend and hope that this thread will give us a 1% chance of properly-weighted equipment!</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29729677/Weight_of_weapons?post_id=528443701#528443701</link><description>Agreed. But I'm going to pretend and hope that this thread will give us a 1% chance of properly-weighted equipment!</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:52:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>they made laughing stock of themselves with all editions up to now with weapon weights, why stop now? Yeah, they don't care, if they did, they would put one guy to read on wikipedia for 5 minutes and get the math to the numbers.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29729677/Weight_of_weapons?post_id=528441879#528441879</link><description>they made laughing stock of themselves with all editions up to now with weapon weights, why stop now? Yeah, they don't care, if they did, they would put one guy to read on wikipedia for 5 minutes and get the math to the numbers.</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:32:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, they're off.No, they don't care yet.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29729677/Weight_of_weapons?post_id=528434055#528434055</link><description>Yes, they're off.No, they don't care yet.</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:13:50 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
