<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: The re-releases are awesome.. SO why switch to Next</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29647433/The_re-releases_are_awesome.._SO_why_switch_to_Next</link><description>I think the two best fantasy Role play systems are Pathfinder and AD&amp;D 2nd edition.  Now AD&amp;D second edition material is available.  WHY should I switch to Next.  I have system mastery of both 3rd edition and 2nd edition, I do not need to spend the t</description><item><title>Howdy folks,I'll be closing this thread now as it has degenerated into an edition war based on whether a given edition failed or not.  As an aside, calling any edition a failure is a form of baiting which is against the Code of Conduct.    Thanks.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29647433/The_re-releases_are_awesome.._SO_why_switch_to_Next?post_id=528458907#528458907</link><description>Howdy folks,I'll be closing this thread now as it has degenerated into an edition war based on whether a given edition failed or not.  As an aside, calling any edition a failure is a form of baiting which is against the Code of Conduct.    Thanks.</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:24:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>"...gotta feeling I've been here before...watch you as you cross the killing floor..."</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29647433/The_re-releases_are_awesome.._SO_why_switch_to_Next?post_id=528457777#528457777</link><description>"...gotta feeling I've been here before...watch you as you cross the killing floor..."</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:44:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hey look, it's this thread again!</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29647433/The_re-releases_are_awesome.._SO_why_switch_to_Next?post_id=528457599#528457599</link><description>Hey look, it's this thread again!</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:38:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's more true that Pathfinder didn't lose. 4E failed not because it was beaten by pathfinder, but rather because it turned a lot of gamers off. That being said, 3E is a very flawed edition waiting for a worthy successor. Unfortunately 4E just wasn't</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29647433/The_re-releases_are_awesome.._SO_why_switch_to_Next?post_id=528457189#528457189</link><description>It's more true that Pathfinder didn't lose. 4E failed not because it was beaten by pathfinder, but rather because it turned a lot of gamers off. That being said, 3E is a very flawed edition waiting for a worthy successor. Unfortunately 4E just wasn't</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:28:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's more true that Pathfinder didn't lose. 4E failed not because it was beaten by pathfinder, but rather because it turned a lot of gamers off. That being said, 3E is a very flawed edition waiting for a worthy successor. Unfortunately 4E just wasn't</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29647433/The_re-releases_are_awesome.._SO_why_switch_to_Next?post_id=528457095#528457095</link><description>It's more true that Pathfinder didn't lose. 4E failed not because it was beaten by pathfinder, but rather because it turned a lot of gamers off. That being said, 3E is a very flawed edition waiting for a worthy successor. Unfortunately 4E just wasn't</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:25:17 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
