<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Legends &amp; Lore - Multiclassing in D&amp;D Next</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29640593/Legends__Lore_-_Multiclassing_in_DD_Next</link><description>Legends &amp; Lore: D&amp;D Next Goals, Part 3by Mike Mearls  This thread focuses on the descriptions of multiclassing in this weeks L&amp;L article.&amp;ldquo;The characters in the standard game are a more diverse lot, with a focus on options to build unique storie</description><item><title>This is the kind of thing I'm talking about.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29640593/Legends__Lore_-_Multiclassing_in_DD_Next?post_id=528716963#528716963</link><description>This is the kind of thing I'm talking about.</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 04:49:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm all for the multiclassing presented (3e style with elements of the 4e hybrid) but would also really like to see the 4e style multiclass dip feats represented as well.Kinda like the current ones for the Priest Speciality, but with more freedom "AN</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29640593/Legends__Lore_-_Multiclassing_in_DD_Next?post_id=528716697#528716697</link><description>I'm all for the multiclassing presented (3e style with elements of the 4e hybrid) but would also really like to see the 4e style multiclass dip feats represented as well.Kinda like the current ones for the Priest Speciality, but with more freedom "AN</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 04:32:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>4th ed style MC feats as class dip feats may not be a bad idea. The main thing in 4th ed was they replaced a popular feature of 3.5 which was multiclassing. Theres no real reason why you could not have 2nd ed or 3rd ed multiclassing existing alongsid</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29640593/Legends__Lore_-_Multiclassing_in_DD_Next?post_id=528715537#528715537</link><description>4th ed style MC feats as class dip feats may not be a bad idea. The main thing in 4th ed was they replaced a popular feature of 3.5 which was multiclassing. Theres no real reason why you could not have 2nd ed or 3rd ed multiclassing existing alongsid</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:00:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>As I said,It's not the details of the 4th Ed Multi feats which is important.After all, without the power system it's pretty pointless to discuss the specifics with reference to Next.But the concept is a good one which should be retained.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29640593/Legends__Lore_-_Multiclassing_in_DD_Next?post_id=528714807#528714807</link><description>As I said,It's not the details of the 4th Ed Multi feats which is important.After all, without the power system it's pretty pointless to discuss the specifics with reference to Next.But the concept is a good one which should be retained.</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:40:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Why does someone HAVE to get thrown under the bus? It was different, but not different enough where they have to completely dump anything it taught them.[/quote]Exactly.And, in the context of this conversation, the Multiclass Feats (allowing "class d</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29640593/Legends__Lore_-_Multiclassing_in_DD_Next?post_id=528714729#528714729</link><description>Why does someone HAVE to get thrown under the bus? It was different, but not different enough where they have to completely dump anything it taught them.[/quote]Exactly.And, in the context of this conversation, the Multiclass Feats (allowing "class d</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:33:06 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
