<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Holy symbol + "can be used as a holy symbol"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29632737/Holy_symbol__can_be_used_as_a_holy_symbol</link><description>Can a weapon that "can be used as a holy symbol" (like the Scepter of Bane) be used in conjunction with an actual holy symbol?RC 274: If a creature wears or holds more than one holy symbol, none of these symbols function until only one remains (this</description><item><title>"can be used as" indicates that it's optional. Interpreting "can" as "always must" would create issues elsewhere in the rules.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29632737/Holy_symbol__can_be_used_as_a_holy_symbol?post_id=528154061#528154061</link><description>"can be used as" indicates that it's optional. Interpreting "can" as "always must" would create issues elsewhere in the rules.</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:20:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>3 users only. What is called a concensus in the linked discussion is 2 persons agreeing with a third one. [/quote]The statement encompasses several other discussions on the matter. I have no poodle in that fight though. Links to other threads are alw</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29632737/Holy_symbol__can_be_used_as_a_holy_symbol?post_id=528153743#528153743</link><description>3 users only. What is called a concensus in the linked discussion is 2 persons agreeing with a third one. [/quote]The statement encompasses several other discussions on the matter. I have no poodle in that fight though. Links to other threads are alw</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:49:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think "counts as" and "can be used as" do mean different things (this should be obvious...), but in the context of MBAs there is no *practical* difference, because there aren't any features that are affected by the distinction.For example, if you h</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29632737/Holy_symbol__can_be_used_as_a_holy_symbol?post_id=528150289#528150289</link><description>I think "counts as" and "can be used as" do mean different things (this should be obvious...), but in the context of MBAs there is no *practical* difference, because there aren't any features that are affected by the distinction.For example, if you h</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:30:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>3 users only. What is called a concensus in the linked discussion is 2 persons agreeing with a third one. To put things in perspetive, an equal number of people here disagree with this premise so i don't know if you can really call that a concensus.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29632737/Holy_symbol__can_be_used_as_a_holy_symbol?post_id=528149339#528149339</link><description>3 users only. What is called a concensus in the linked discussion is 2 persons agreeing with a third one. To put things in perspetive, an equal number of people here disagree with this premise so i don't know if you can really call that a concensus.</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:44:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Exactly. From the forum FAQ, if desired:"If a power counts as a Basic Attack, is it affected by everything that effects a Basic Attack? The concensus is that if the power is worded as 'in place of', is not an actual Basic Attack. However, if it is wo</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29632737/Holy_symbol__can_be_used_as_a_holy_symbol?post_id=528148339#528148339</link><description>Exactly. From the forum FAQ, if desired:"If a power counts as a Basic Attack, is it affected by everything that effects a Basic Attack? The concensus is that if the power is worded as 'in place of', is not an actual Basic Attack. However, if it is wo</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:59:03 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
