<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dragon 419 Compilation</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29628721/Dragon_419_Compilation</link><description>Dragon 419 CompilationBy Jim Auwaerter, Logan Bonner, Ed Greenwood, Doug Hyatt, Claudio Pozas, Robert J. Schwalb, Steve WinterVisit the blighted Mournland and discover the inner workings of sentient living spells. Find out why many consider bladeling</description><item><title>I've been playing a bladeling avenger in LFR who's currently 10th level.  I've never bemoaned the lack of feat support but I was excited to see this article.  However, I don't understand the motivation behind the nerf to Improved Razor Storm, the one</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29628721/Dragon_419_Compilation?post_id=528462823#528462823</link><description>I've been playing a bladeling avenger in LFR who's currently 10th level.  I've never bemoaned the lack of feat support but I was excited to see this article.  However, I don't understand the motivation behind the nerf to Improved Razor Storm, the one</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:16:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I hate when that happens.  (Edit: I'm gonna guess you said "+3/1d6 light blade, Enchantable like Gnoll Claws".  That's still a crap martial weapon, which is a shame for a feat.  The shortsword has the good grace to be off-hand out of the box, and the</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29628721/Dragon_419_Compilation?post_id=528172079#528172079</link><description>I hate when that happens.  (Edit: I'm gonna guess you said "+3/1d6 light blade, Enchantable like Gnoll Claws".  That's still a crap martial weapon, which is a shame for a feat.  The shortsword has the good grace to be off-hand out of the box, and the</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:55:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That's pretty close to my original draft of these feats.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29628721/Dragon_419_Compilation?post_id=528171973#528171973</link><description>That's pretty close to my original draft of these feats.</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:52:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The "Unarmed Strike is High-Crit" feat should have no Preqs.  The "You have an unarmed strike feature" feat should give +3/1d8 light-blade unarmed strike, and Ki-proficiency (or something of that caliber).The Storm-Pillar companion should be labeled</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29628721/Dragon_419_Compilation?post_id=528166353#528166353</link><description>The "Unarmed Strike is High-Crit" feat should have no Preqs.  The "You have an unarmed strike feature" feat should give +3/1d8 light-blade unarmed strike, and Ki-proficiency (or something of that caliber).The Storm-Pillar companion should be labeled</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:07:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It is certainly strong, but I do not think it overpowered. The ally must be adjacent, this is quite a serious limitation. Limiting it further would mean it does not fit into the 18 strongest feats for a sorcerer or wizard, essentially rendering it us</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29628721/Dragon_419_Compilation?post_id=528094845#528094845</link><description>It is certainly strong, but I do not think it overpowered. The ally must be adjacent, this is quite a serious limitation. Limiting it further would mean it does not fit into the 18 strongest feats for a sorcerer or wizard, essentially rendering it us</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 02:56:54 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
