<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Full Page Monster Stats?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29616999/Full_Page_Monster_Stats</link><description>Monsters don't need to be full characters. Why a full page monster that is a complete character? Base the saves/attacks/whatever on HD and simplify it.</description><item><title>We don't need them, but having full-page monsters doesn't harm anything.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29616999/Full_Page_Monster_Stats?post_id=528106939#528106939</link><description>We don't need them, but having full-page monsters doesn't harm anything.</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:53:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Look at Kobolds- they have the generic 'grunts,' the dragonshields, the urds, and the alchemist. It seems they ARE having a few specializations within the monsters for the ones that you'll fight many of. Some of the monsters don't have as many, but t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29616999/Full_Page_Monster_Stats?post_id=528100231#528100231</link><description>Look at Kobolds- they have the generic 'grunts,' the dragonshields, the urds, and the alchemist. It seems they ARE having a few specializations within the monsters for the ones that you'll fight many of. Some of the monsters don't have as many, but t</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:15:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree with a couple of posters - we dont need the full AD&amp;D stat blocks, keep the current/4E format - but a decent amount of 'fluff' is needed tooMy major concern is that the developers are moving back to a 3.5 and early method of having a vanilla</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29616999/Full_Page_Monster_Stats?post_id=528099837#528099837</link><description>I agree with a couple of posters - we dont need the full AD&amp;D stat blocks, keep the current/4E format - but a decent amount of 'fluff' is needed tooMy major concern is that the developers are moving back to a 3.5 and early method of having a vanilla</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:58:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>and that's why full-page monsters are completely harmless.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29616999/Full_Page_Monster_Stats?post_id=528059645#528059645</link><description>and that's why full-page monsters are completely harmless.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:16:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>/thread derail initiated"For instance, what if you met Orcs who liked to use squad tactics due to strong regimental traditions, as opposed to berserker rages?"I would in this specific instance use hobgoblin stats and tell the players they are meeting</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29616999/Full_Page_Monster_Stats?post_id=528056083#528056083</link><description>/thread derail initiated"For instance, what if you met Orcs who liked to use squad tactics due to strong regimental traditions, as opposed to berserker rages?"I would in this specific instance use hobgoblin stats and tell the players they are meeting</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:00:52 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
