New Posts For Thread: Forging The Realms: Quelzard, Patron of Adventurershttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29613215/Forging_The_Realms:_Quelzard,_Patron_of_AdventurersForging The RealmsQuelzard, Patron of AdventurersBy Ed GreenwoodThe Company of Crazed Venturers, my first PC adventuring band, never even knew he existed . . . though they came to suspect his presence, once or twice.Talk about this column here.As someone who has played with Ed as a DM many times, I totally disagree with Jorunhast. Who seems to have totally missed Ed's point: what Quelzard did is what a lot of doppelgangers do. "Maintaining" (helping) "their" pets (a group of adventurers) fhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29613215/Forging_The_Realms:_Quelzard,_Patron_of_Adventurers?post_id=527930485#527930485As someone who has played with Ed as a DM many times, I totally disagree with Jorunhast. Who seems to have totally missed Ed's point: what Quelzard did is what a lot of doppelgangers do. "Maintaining" (helping) "their" pets (a group of adventurers) fThu, 10 Jan 2013 15:43:39 -0600I enjoyed this article. To me it seems a patron can be useful to a DM when it looks like the players are running out of options, i.e. are soon to be dead. I don't think it takes away from the player's actions or interferes with the suspension of disbhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29613215/Forging_The_Realms:_Quelzard,_Patron_of_Adventurers?post_id=527881227#527881227I enjoyed this article. To me it seems a patron can be useful to a DM when it looks like the players are running out of options, i.e. are soon to be dead. I don't think it takes away from the player's actions or interferes with the suspension of disbTue, 08 Jan 2013 23:00:54 -0600Criticism of an article or an idea/concept is not the same thing as anger. At no point have I been angry, and frankly it's getting a little tiresome that you're still suggesting it. But whatever.I'm also not advocating "dungeon only" types of advenhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29613215/Forging_The_Realms:_Quelzard,_Patron_of_Adventurers?post_id=527810777#527810777Criticism of an article or an idea/concept is not the same thing as anger. At no point have I been angry, and frankly it's getting a little tiresome that you're still suggesting it. But whatever.I'm also not advocating "dungeon only" types of advenSun, 06 Jan 2013 14:57:20 -0600And you're obligated to run your FR campaign with all sorts of NPCs interfering in your game?[/quote]Obligated? Not at all. But when a designer writes an article advocating this kind of thing, that's where it's a problem.[/quote]I didn't see Ed advhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29613215/Forging_The_Realms:_Quelzard,_Patron_of_Adventurers?post_id=527810361#527810361And you're obligated to run your FR campaign with all sorts of NPCs interfering in your game?[/quote]Obligated? Not at all. But when a designer writes an article advocating this kind of thing, that's where it's a problem.[/quote]I didn't see Ed advSun, 06 Jan 2013 14:49:09 -0600And you're obligated to run your FR campaign with all sorts of NPCs interfering in your game?[/quote]Obligated? Not at all. But when a designer writes an article advocating this kind of thing, that's where it's a problem.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29613215/Forging_The_Realms:_Quelzard,_Patron_of_Adventurers?post_id=527806401#527806401And you're obligated to run your FR campaign with all sorts of NPCs interfering in your game?[/quote]Obligated? Not at all. But when a designer writes an article advocating this kind of thing, that's where it's a problem.Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:05:48 -0600