New Posts For Thread: Oozemaster clarification?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29611713/Oozemaster_clarificationAccording to Masters of the Wild:"At 10th level, the oozemaster is as slimy as the creatures he favors. His type changes to ooze for determining what effects and items can affect him. He gains the Blindsight feat (hearing-based version, see Chapter 2It certainly makes seeking a desirable enchantment for would-be mage slayers. :)http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29611713/Oozemaster_clarification?post_id=527732333#527732333It certainly makes seeking a desirable enchantment for would-be mage slayers. :)Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:30:18 -0600This is just probability arithmetic, not really a comprehensive view of "math". Nor is it really a good view of probability (but now I'm letting my inner Bayesian show).(Nothing personal, but it really bugs me when people conflate doing sums, algebrahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29611713/Oozemaster_clarification?post_id=527729623#527729623This is just probability arithmetic, not really a comprehensive view of "math". Nor is it really a good view of probability (but now I'm letting my inner Bayesian show).(Nothing personal, but it really bugs me when people conflate doing sums, algebraThu, 03 Jan 2013 21:29:37 -0600Like I said, I'm bad at math But 2 LF effects stacking like that sounds pretty good. Nearly a 50% chance to avoid taking critical damage just from combining a class ability and a fairly cheap (I think?) enchantment.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29611713/Oozemaster_clarification?post_id=527728651#527728651Like I said, I'm bad at math But 2 LF effects stacking like that sounds pretty good. Nearly a 50% chance to avoid taking critical damage just from combining a class ability and a fairly cheap (I think?) enchantment.Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:34:13 -0600I also didn't point out that 37.5% is 3/8, not 5/8 (that's 62.5%); I was too busy considering your method to notice.37.5% is off by 25% of 25% - in other words, it's the probability that EITHER ONE negates BUT NOT BOTH. (This Venn, which is the correhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29611713/Oozemaster_clarification?post_id=527727155#527727155I also didn't point out that 37.5% is 3/8, not 5/8 (that's 62.5%); I was too busy considering your method to notice.37.5% is off by 25% of 25% - in other words, it's the probability that EITHER ONE negates BUT NOT BOTH. (This Venn, which is the correThu, 03 Jan 2013 19:18:20 -0600In that case... I don't know how the hell I came up with that number. I blame it on not dealing with math since '94. :-Phttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29611713/Oozemaster_clarification?post_id=527726877#527726877In that case... I don't know how the hell I came up with that number. I blame it on not dealing with math since '94. :-PThu, 03 Jan 2013 19:03:57 -0600