New Posts For Thread: Feedback From a DM of 25 Years from Basic All the Way Up to D&D Nexthttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29528971/Feedback_From_a_DM_of_25_Years_from_Basic_All_the_Way_Up_to_DD_NextEveningI have been playing for 25 years, 95% of that time DMing D&D from Basic to Expert to 1st edition all the way up to 4th edition and now D&D Next.My gaming group has played 4e for roughly the past two years. There is a lot to like but it too suThink of the modules detect magic will ruin? You mean none of them ever, right?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29528971/Feedback_From_a_DM_of_25_Years_from_Basic_All_the_Way_Up_to_DD_Next?post_id=527519205#527519205Think of the modules detect magic will ruin? You mean none of them ever, right?Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:23:18 -0600I agree with point about skills (assuming I understood correctly). I really didn't see any problem with 3.5's skill system and I can't find a reason to get rid of it. If anything, the problem with using abilities is that there is no realistic or plauhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29528971/Feedback_From_a_DM_of_25_Years_from_Basic_All_the_Way_Up_to_DD_Next?post_id=527506539#527506539I agree with point about skills (assuming I understood correctly). I really didn't see any problem with 3.5's skill system and I can't find a reason to get rid of it. If anything, the problem with using abilities is that there is no realistic or plauWed, 26 Dec 2012 14:07:45 -0600You can always make it "choose one" I personaly like being able to play the sherlock homes (new BBC) like character.. he is razor sharp, but not the wiseist man in the house...http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29528971/Feedback_From_a_DM_of_25_Years_from_Basic_All_the_Way_Up_to_DD_Next?post_id=527346611#527346611You can always make it "choose one" I personaly like being able to play the sherlock homes (new BBC) like character.. he is razor sharp, but not the wiseist man in the house...Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:25:04 -0600Agree with the confusion surrounding Perception/Wisdom for spotting and listening... please keep it simple and stick to one attribute for that.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29528971/Feedback_From_a_DM_of_25_Years_from_Basic_All_the_Way_Up_to_DD_Next?post_id=526755907#526755907Agree with the confusion surrounding Perception/Wisdom for spotting and listening... please keep it simple and stick to one attribute for that.Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:53:37 -0600Some good points there about simplicity . overall, though, I think it s easier to house rule simplicity than it is to house rule complexity. By which I mean: if rules allow for some complexity, though not too much, you can always and easily house rulhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29528971/Feedback_From_a_DM_of_25_Years_from_Basic_All_the_Way_Up_to_DD_Next?post_id=526748189#526748189Some good points there about simplicity . overall, though, I think it s easier to house rule simplicity than it is to house rule complexity. By which I mean: if rules allow for some complexity, though not too much, you can always and easily house rulSun, 09 Dec 2012 15:38:58 -0600