<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Quick question on treasure chests</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29515293/Quick_question_on_treasure_chests</link><description>In setting up a two player game I found myself laying out treasure chests from just one of the sets.  Is this the wrong way to do it?  I'm thinking it is because that way you guarantee two 3s, two 2s, and two 1s.  If you shuffled each sets chests sep</description><item><title>Great, so I was doing it right.  Thanks for the replys.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29515293/Quick_question_on_treasure_chests?post_id=526515833#526515833</link><description>Great, so I was doing it right.  Thanks for the replys.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 11:07:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Two each of 1's, 2's and 3's is indeed the intended way to play. Was confirmed by Chris Dupuis in an earlier post somewhere around here.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29515293/Quick_question_on_treasure_chests?post_id=526505601#526505601</link><description>Two each of 1's, 2's and 3's is indeed the intended way to play. Was confirmed by Chris Dupuis in an earlier post somewhere around here.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:14:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I believe that is the way it is intended but my friend and I play with one set each, I think this balances it and keeps one player from getting all the threes and twos. (though that could still happen)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29515293/Quick_question_on_treasure_chests?post_id=526454903#526454903</link><description>I believe that is the way it is intended but my friend and I play with one set each, I think this balances it and keeps one player from getting all the threes and twos. (though that could still happen)</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:10:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In setting up a two player game I found myself laying out treasure chests from just one of the sets.  Is this the wrong way to do it?  I'm thinking it is because that way you guarantee two 3s, two 2s, and two 1s.  If you shuffled each sets chests sep</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29515293/Quick_question_on_treasure_chests?post_id=526454671#526454671</link><description>In setting up a two player game I found myself laying out treasure chests from just one of the sets.  Is this the wrong way to do it?  I'm thinking it is because that way you guarantee two 3s, two 2s, and two 1s.  If you shuffled each sets chests sep</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:59:39 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
