<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Are They Really Listening to Feedback?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510819/Are_They_Really_Listening_to_Feedback</link><description>I don't recall where I read it, and don't have time to dig, but at some point someone in the development team was quoted as saying (paraphrasing here) that it was odd to see and respond to everyone's comments on the most recent packet, as it was put</description><item><title>Yes, they're listening to feedback.  That doesn't mean they're obligated to use the suggestions given in the feedback.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510819/Are_They_Really_Listening_to_Feedback?post_id=526534039#526534039</link><description>Yes, they're listening to feedback.  That doesn't mean they're obligated to use the suggestions given in the feedback.</description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 00:28:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's counterintuitive, but they're probably not giving us their best stuff. When the designers have fantastic ideas, the kind like expertise dice where they're certain it's gold, they can hold back a few months and develop them a bit more. It's the d</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510819/Are_They_Really_Listening_to_Feedback?post_id=526491775#526491775</link><description>It's counterintuitive, but they're probably not giving us their best stuff. When the designers have fantastic ideas, the kind like expertise dice where they're certain it's gold, they can hold back a few months and develop them a bit more. It's the d</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:40:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That makes sense. But it doesn't seem to be exactly what they're doing, as the latest packet made some rather wild changes in very core mechanics.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510819/Are_They_Really_Listening_to_Feedback?post_id=526473803#526473803</link><description>That makes sense. But it doesn't seem to be exactly what they're doing, as the latest packet made some rather wild changes in very core mechanics.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:01:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Since they are dealing with modular design, even if they are working on 2 or 3 packets ahead, they may be working on completely different aspects of the game.   It actually makes sense that they work ahead in other areas while they are waiting for fe</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510819/Are_They_Really_Listening_to_Feedback?post_id=526447371#526447371</link><description>Since they are dealing with modular design, even if they are working on 2 or 3 packets ahead, they may be working on completely different aspects of the game.   It actually makes sense that they work ahead in other areas while they are waiting for fe</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:30:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>A lot of people made that assumption.  Myself included.  I was getting really flusterated about how things were going.  now I'm just going to sit back and hope someday we do see something closer to what they want the finished product to be.  I hope t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510819/Are_They_Really_Listening_to_Feedback?post_id=526447297#526447297</link><description>A lot of people made that assumption.  Myself included.  I was getting really flusterated about how things were going.  now I'm just going to sit back and hope someday we do see something closer to what they want the finished product to be.  I hope t</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:24:03 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
