<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What 5E should be</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510055/What_5E_should_be</link><description>Here is my take on what 5E should be.There should be a core that has all the shared elements of all of the editions with fixed math and dice.So core should literally be roll 1d20 + bonuses - penalties try to get over a target number (DC, AC, etc...et</description><item><title>Some players don't care about balance, and many editions the monsters are meant to be deadly...[/quote]I am one.  I like my monsters deadly.  I do not care if the classes are balanced to each other.  As a DM, I balance the gameplay myself based on my</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510055/What_5E_should_be?post_id=526393091#526393091</link><description>Some players don't care about balance, and many editions the monsters are meant to be deadly...[/quote]I am one.  I like my monsters deadly.  I do not care if the classes are balanced to each other.  As a DM, I balance the gameplay myself based on my</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:04:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That's an even better idea.To get it to work, defaults need to be compartmentalized, so it's easy to know what any given module is enhancing or replacing.[/quote]That's why I had [#]A and [#]B...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510055/What_5E_should_be?post_id=526393067#526393067</link><description>That's an even better idea.To get it to work, defaults need to be compartmentalized, so it's easy to know what any given module is enhancing or replacing.[/quote]That's why I had [#]A and [#]B...</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:02:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Some players don't care about balance, and many editions the monsters are meant to be deadly...[/quote]I am one.  I like my monsters deadly.  I do not care if the classes are balanced to each other.  As a DM, I balance the gameplay myself based on my</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510055/What_5E_should_be?post_id=526381317#526381317</link><description>Some players don't care about balance, and many editions the monsters are meant to be deadly...[/quote]I am one.  I like my monsters deadly.  I do not care if the classes are balanced to each other.  As a DM, I balance the gameplay myself based on my</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:24:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think it much better for the group to decide whether or not they'll use Expertise Dice as a group. That way there won't be some PCs who use the concept and others who don't.[/quote]That is still possible. The group can decide which optional modules</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510055/What_5E_should_be?post_id=526381017#526381017</link><description>I think it much better for the group to decide whether or not they'll use Expertise Dice as a group. That way there won't be some PCs who use the concept and others who don't.[/quote]That is still possible. The group can decide which optional modules</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:09:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think it much better for the group to decide whether or not they'll use Expertise Dice as a group. That way there won't be some PCs who use the concept and others who don't.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29510055/What_5E_should_be?post_id=526377683#526377683</link><description>I think it much better for the group to decide whether or not they'll use Expertise Dice as a group. That way there won't be some PCs who use the concept and others who don't.</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:37:30 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
