<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 4e: the full story. And a question about the future</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29508051/4e:_the_full_story._And_a_question_about_the_future</link><description>I have read flame wars and heard arguments about the merits and problems with 4e (more of the latter than the former admittedly). I have played 4e and while it has flaws I never understood the vitriol of its detractors. I have heard piecemeal tidbits</description><item><title>This thread is almost all edition warring, all the time now, and because of that I'll be closing it down.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29508051/4e:_the_full_story._And_a_question_about_the_future?post_id=526380421#526380421</link><description>This thread is almost all edition warring, all the time now, and because of that I'll be closing it down.</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:42:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That's not munchkining.Right, that's why a vast majority of the community just ignores any and all builds, no one ever asks anyone else for build help,...oh wait. Nevermind. In any game with stats and choices, you're going to have builds. Many see th</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29508051/4e:_the_full_story._And_a_question_about_the_future?post_id=526380313#526380313</link><description>That's not munchkining.Right, that's why a vast majority of the community just ignores any and all builds, no one ever asks anyone else for build help,...oh wait. Nevermind. In any game with stats and choices, you're going to have builds. Many see th</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:38:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Stop right there.  There is no "poorly" designed character, objectively. [/quote]Stop right there.He didn't say anything about porrly designed characters. That is all on the player and the group.He said poorly designed CLASSES. That is all on the des</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29508051/4e:_the_full_story._And_a_question_about_the_future?post_id=526380285#526380285</link><description>Stop right there.  There is no "poorly" designed character, objectively. [/quote]Stop right there.He didn't say anything about porrly designed characters. That is all on the player and the group.He said poorly designed CLASSES. That is all on the des</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:35:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I want to have fun by contributing to the team activities and feel my character and my choices have significant impact on play results..  TPK really are a lose by the way.. a lose for every one around (including the DM usually) because it tends to un</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29508051/4e:_the_full_story._And_a_question_about_the_future?post_id=526380185#526380185</link><description>I want to have fun by contributing to the team activities and feel my character and my choices have significant impact on play results..  TPK really are a lose by the way.. a lose for every one around (including the DM usually) because it tends to un</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:31:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Stop right there.  There is no "poorly" designed character class, objectively.   [/quote]I didnt say character... I said class.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29508051/4e:_the_full_story._And_a_question_about_the_future?post_id=526380135#526380135</link><description>Stop right there.  There is no "poorly" designed character class, objectively.   [/quote]I didnt say character... I said class.</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:28:06 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
