<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: D&amp;D Next</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29504545/DD_Next</link><description>I'd just like to give a shout out to the development crew and say that you're doing a great job with Next. I might be in the minority here, but after play testing the latest version...my gamers fell in love with the return to basic D&amp;D and we only wa</description><item><title>"soon"[/quote]:twitch:</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29504545/DD_Next?post_id=526313331#526313331</link><description>"soon"[/quote]:twitch:</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:35:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I got tired of hearing "soon" from WotC back in the mid to late 4E days. Why would I believe them now?[/quote]+1</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29504545/DD_Next?post_id=526312143#526312143</link><description>I got tired of hearing "soon" from WotC back in the mid to late 4E days. Why would I believe them now?[/quote]+1</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:48:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I got tired of hearing "soon" from WotC back in the mid to late 4E days. Why would I believe them now?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29504545/DD_Next?post_id=526312119#526312119</link><description>I got tired of hearing "soon" from WotC back in the mid to late 4E days. Why would I believe them now?</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:47:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's a fair complaint - that Wotc could get more reflective data if they asked "how much have you play tested this packet and why".   You can argue that their data would be better or worse.  But, maybe I'm missing something, but I was one of the peop</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29504545/DD_Next?post_id=526290809#526290809</link><description>It's a fair complaint - that Wotc could get more reflective data if they asked "how much have you play tested this packet and why".   You can argue that their data would be better or worse.  But, maybe I'm missing something, but I was one of the peop</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:33:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, but as was said, dead levels are not what they are testing at the moment. They know people don't like them. They understand they are an issue. But they are not essential to creating the core of the game and the mechanics to go with it. They are</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29504545/DD_Next?post_id=526289665#526289665</link><description>Yes, but as was said, dead levels are not what they are testing at the moment. They know people don't like them. They understand they are an issue. But they are not essential to creating the core of the game and the mechanics to go with it. They are</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:57:39 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
