New Posts For Thread: Weapons and sizes for DDNhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29501721/Weapons_and_sizes_for_DDNTo get a simply table of weapons and who can wield them and in what way, I think that the best way is 3.0E(not 3.5) solution with sizes.So for starters weapon sizes would be:tiny,small,medium,large,huge,small creatures, can wield tiny weapons as fineHalflings are worse at killing each other than humans are (same hit points, less damage). (Which was true in 3e as well, but still just comical.)http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29501721/Weapons_and_sizes_for_DDN?post_id=526272055#526272055Halflings are worse at killing each other than humans are (same hit points, less damage). (Which was true in 3e as well, but still just comical.)Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:18:47 -0600I don't see how that's relevant. It is exactly because of bounded accuracy that it is more inappropriate than ever to model the accuracy bonus I described as a bonus to attack rolls rather than damage rolls. If you want to try to say that bounded acchttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29501721/Weapons_and_sizes_for_DDN?post_id=526271997#526271997I don't see how that's relevant. It is exactly because of bounded accuracy that it is more inappropriate than ever to model the accuracy bonus I described as a bonus to attack rolls rather than damage rolls. If you want to try to say that bounded accWed, 21 Nov 2012 23:09:25 -0600I don't disagree with any of this. You have convinced yourself that I think something that I don't think.[/quote]In case you forgot (because I really dislike multi-quotes), this is in direct response to your statement that no race should ever have ahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29501721/Weapons_and_sizes_for_DDN?post_id=526271809#526271809I don't disagree with any of this. You have convinced yourself that I think something that I don't think.[/quote]In case you forgot (because I really dislike multi-quotes), this is in direct response to your statement that no race should ever have aWed, 21 Nov 2012 22:47:46 -0600Do you not get that I see what you think you're trying to do: compensate for size, replacing damage for BAB since that's the way of bounded accuracy. Unfortunately for you, you can't do that in a vacuum. There's a gaping flaw to your approach of thishttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29501721/Weapons_and_sizes_for_DDN?post_id=526271741#526271741Do you not get that I see what you think you're trying to do: compensate for size, replacing damage for BAB since that's the way of bounded accuracy. Unfortunately for you, you can't do that in a vacuum. There's a gaping flaw to your approach of thisWed, 21 Nov 2012 22:42:02 -0600Sure. Why not? The Halfling is going to be significantly more accurate with it due to the perspective advantage offered by its smaller size. That accuracy advantage is then mechanically modeled by a higher base damage die.In 3.5, the difference wouldhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29501721/Weapons_and_sizes_for_DDN?post_id=526271531#526271531Sure. Why not? The Halfling is going to be significantly more accurate with it due to the perspective advantage offered by its smaller size. That accuracy advantage is then mechanically modeled by a higher base damage die.In 3.5, the difference wouldWed, 21 Nov 2012 22:23:33 -0600