<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What mechanics would honestly make you not buy 5E?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29498123/What_mechanics_would_honestly_make_you_not_buy_5E</link><description>Perhaps I'm mistaken, but over the course of life I've noticed that internet forums are prone to hyperbole. Even when it's a legitimate critique, this hyperbole can make it hard to figure out what needs tweaking, and what is a major red flag.Case in</description><item><title>RAGEQUITNOVA: This concept needs to go away. One or two powers that can be used once a day are fine, but an entire spellcasting system based on NOVA cannot help but be unbalanced. This is why Wizards and Clerics ruled the roost in 3rd Edition. This i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29498123/What_mechanics_would_honestly_make_you_not_buy_5E?post_id=532169623#532169623</link><description>RAGEQUITNOVA: This concept needs to go away. One or two powers that can be used once a day are fine, but an entire spellcasting system based on NOVA cannot help but be unbalanced. This is why Wizards and Clerics ruled the roost in 3rd Edition. This i</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 02:23:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>For me personally....RAGEQUIT:  HP inflation, leveling too quickly, all classes feeling the same, the game being more than 50 percent orented towards combat when it its supposed to be a role-playing game, splitting popular class/races into three sepa</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29498123/What_mechanics_would_honestly_make_you_not_buy_5E?post_id=532049441#532049441</link><description>For me personally....RAGEQUIT:  HP inflation, leveling too quickly, all classes feeling the same, the game being more than 50 percent orented towards combat when it its supposed to be a role-playing game, splitting popular class/races into three sepa</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:54:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Dealbreakers:A 3.5/4e style skill list.I remember someone's DM playtest feedback that I particularly agreed with. The user said something along the lines of "I never want to see a skill list section on a character sheet again." Couldn't agree more.Un</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29498123/What_mechanics_would_honestly_make_you_not_buy_5E?post_id=531520333#531520333</link><description>Dealbreakers:A 3.5/4e style skill list.I remember someone's DM playtest feedback that I particularly agreed with. The user said something along the lines of "I never want to see a skill list section on a character sheet again." Couldn't agree more.Un</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:50:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Bear in mind that Hasbro also owns Scrabble, and look what happened with "Words With Friends".  Hasbro does not understand the Internet.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29498123/What_mechanics_would_honestly_make_you_not_buy_5E?post_id=531495011#531495011</link><description>Bear in mind that Hasbro also owns Scrabble, and look what happened with "Words With Friends".  Hasbro does not understand the Internet.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:56:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Inevitably, there will be some inferior abilities.  They're not desireable:  they are, at best, chaff, something worthless bundled with the good bits of the game that you actually want, like deceptive or wasteful packaging, undesireable, but once you</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29498123/What_mechanics_would_honestly_make_you_not_buy_5E?post_id=531466565#531466565</link><description>Inevitably, there will be some inferior abilities.  They're not desireable:  they are, at best, chaff, something worthless bundled with the good bits of the game that you actually want, like deceptive or wasteful packaging, undesireable, but once you</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:31:48 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
