<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Monk Feedback Redux</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29495761/Monk_Feedback_Redux</link><description>Recreated the thread as the OP could not be edited due to moderator edits.First of all, I'd like to congratulate the design team on a mostly successful first shot at the Monk, particularly their excellent use and adaptation of my crude attempt based</description><item><title>It's worth pointing out that today's L&amp;L article indicates that the strict alignment restrictions won't be staying.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29495761/Monk_Feedback_Redux?post_id=526771917#526771917</link><description>It's worth pointing out that today's L&amp;L article indicates that the strict alignment restrictions won't be staying.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:41:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>They reinstituted the alignment restrictions?  By all that's rational and good, I thought we were past this crap.I mean, unless 5E is going to define "lawful" in this game as disciplined and nothing else (such that I could play a character who was di</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29495761/Monk_Feedback_Redux?post_id=526709529#526709529</link><description>They reinstituted the alignment restrictions?  By all that's rational and good, I thought we were past this crap.I mean, unless 5E is going to define "lawful" in this game as disciplined and nothing else (such that I could play a character who was di</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 10:11:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Bumping for posterity.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29495761/Monk_Feedback_Redux?post_id=526517681#526517681</link><description>Bumping for posterity.</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:02:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, I had updated the unarmed damage increment to occur at level 6.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29495761/Monk_Feedback_Redux?post_id=526162765#526162765</link><description>Yeah, I had updated the unarmed damage increment to occur at level 6.</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:07:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I like the notion of ki refresh and ki burning. I think the monk's fists could get to d8 when the fighter gets his second attack. It's not anywhere equivalent, but it seems like a reasonable place for a damage boost.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29495761/Monk_Feedback_Redux?post_id=526147743#526147743</link><description>I like the notion of ki refresh and ki burning. I think the monk's fists could get to d8 when the fighter gets his second attack. It's not anywhere equivalent, but it seems like a reasonable place for a damage boost.</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:19:01 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
