<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: For 5e, a New Setting</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29488871/For_5e,_a_New_Setting</link><description>Let 3rd party publishers have Forgotten Realms, Eberron, Greyhawk, and other locations. Give 5th edition a new setting, a setting of its own. That setting" 13th century Earth.Why 13th century Earth?Coherency. Frankly, next to M.A.R. Barker and E. Gar</description><item><title>As a big D20 Modern/Masque of the Red Death/other RPGs with an Earthy setting, I would love a Dark Age Earth (with or without fantasy elements) setting!  It helps that I love Arthurian Legend and Chivalric Romance, classic Sword and Sorcery.  Now, I</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29488871/For_5e,_a_New_Setting?post_id=526191523#526191523</link><description>As a big D20 Modern/Masque of the Red Death/other RPGs with an Earthy setting, I would love a Dark Age Earth (with or without fantasy elements) setting!  It helps that I love Arthurian Legend and Chivalric Romance, classic Sword and Sorcery.  Now, I</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:23:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I say 13th century Earth because there are tons of resources. And libraries are always available.And there's a ton of stuff that hasn't made it on the Web yet.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29488871/For_5e,_a_New_Setting?post_id=526159951#526159951</link><description>I say 13th century Earth because there are tons of resources. And libraries are always available.And there's a ton of stuff that hasn't made it on the Web yet.</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:59:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Off-topic: they could probably find room somewhere in the Realms for a less detailed, less restricted Vale of some sort.fwiw: I too disliked the Realms for decades, before I discovered that it had effectively become the default D&amp;D setting.[/quote]I</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29488871/For_5e,_a_New_Setting?post_id=526137945#526137945</link><description>Off-topic: they could probably find room somewhere in the Realms for a less detailed, less restricted Vale of some sort.fwiw: I too disliked the Realms for decades, before I discovered that it had effectively become the default D&amp;D setting.[/quote]I</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:13:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Off-topic: they could probably find room somewhere in the Realms for a less detailed, less restricted Vale of some sort.fwiw: I too disliked the Realms for decades, before I discovered that it had effectively become the default D&amp;D setting.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29488871/For_5e,_a_New_Setting?post_id=526130219#526130219</link><description>Off-topic: they could probably find room somewhere in the Realms for a less detailed, less restricted Vale of some sort.fwiw: I too disliked the Realms for decades, before I discovered that it had effectively become the default D&amp;D setting.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:24:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Certainly, but given the ginormity of Realms support leading up to (and into) 5e, it seems fairly semantic.[/quote]It would be a terrible idea to do so for the "default settings", because forgotten realms is way too detailed and restricted for new pl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29488871/For_5e,_a_New_Setting?post_id=526129733#526129733</link><description>Certainly, but given the ginormity of Realms support leading up to (and into) 5e, it seems fairly semantic.[/quote]It would be a terrible idea to do so for the "default settings", because forgotten realms is way too detailed and restricted for new pl</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:11:46 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
