<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What if (almost) every spell created a lasting effect?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29487261/What_if_(almost)_every_spell_created_a_lasting_effect</link><description>This idea occurred to me after reading one of Garthanos' suggestions regarding wizards, which I believe was the one about giving the wizard things to eat up his actions such that he didn't need a spell to cast every round. I believe specifically he m</description><item><title>I'm not sure if that was something I posted around here or not (I definitely remember suggesting something to that effect in the survey, but can't remember if it was something I posted here or if someone else is thinking on the same lines as me), but</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29487261/What_if_(almost)_every_spell_created_a_lasting_effect?post_id=525971567#525971567</link><description>I'm not sure if that was something I posted around here or not (I definitely remember suggesting something to that effect in the survey, but can't remember if it was something I posted here or if someone else is thinking on the same lines as me), but</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:41:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe a few more spells like Snilocks Snowball and Geraldine's eight lucky sling rocks at low levels is all you need.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29487261/What_if_(almost)_every_spell_created_a_lasting_effect?post_id=525969161#525969161</link><description>Maybe a few more spells like Snilocks Snowball and Geraldine's eight lucky sling rocks at low levels is all you need.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:02:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That's an interesting concept.  Many spells could have an at-will effect that can be sustained/re=produced while you concentrate on that spell?  So a wall of fire could produce bolts of fire that do 1d6 fire damage or something?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29487261/What_if_(almost)_every_spell_created_a_lasting_effect?post_id=525966939#525966939</link><description>That's an interesting concept.  Many spells could have an at-will effect that can be sustained/re=produced while you concentrate on that spell?  So a wall of fire could produce bolts of fire that do 1d6 fire damage or something?</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 03:32:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Check out this casting system ... its slick not just because it inhibits the nova 5mwd but just because.... ought to work along side having a full set of spells too.  http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29487869/Concentration:_A</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29487261/What_if_(almost)_every_spell_created_a_lasting_effect?post_id=525966601#525966601</link><description>Check out this casting system ... its slick not just because it inhibits the nova 5mwd but just because.... ought to work along side having a full set of spells too.  http://community.wizards.com/dndnext/go/thread/view/75882/29487869/Concentration:_A</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 03:04:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I definitely like where you all are going with this. You make an interesting point Seerow, which I think I heard someone else mention (apologies if it was you). Why doesn't the wizard get all of their spells slots up front? I mean, everything I hear</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/29487261/What_if_(almost)_every_spell_created_a_lasting_effect?post_id=525966569#525966569</link><description>I definitely like where you all are going with this. You make an interesting point Seerow, which I think I heard someone else mention (apologies if it was you). Why doesn't the wizard get all of their spells slots up front? I mean, everything I hear</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 03:00:48 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
